Frequently, a crisis could have been a risk factor that eventually led to the juvenile entering the justice system. Especially when crisis intervention is needed, it is very important to be able to identify ethical situations and ethical strategies associated with juvenile offenders.
Continuing in your role as a juvenile court probation officer and using the same client, Jennifer Scott, from the Week 2 assignment, examine ethical challenges that can impact supervision strategies by writing a 700-word advocacy letter that will be presented to the judge during a hearing on your client’s risk and needs. You may want to review her background again.
Specifically, your letter should do the following:
Summarize your client’s situation and major risk factors.
Identify 1 ethical challenge that affects your client.
Apply 3 ethical strategies that will address the challenge.
Examine the role you will have as an advocate.
Discuss how advocacy can be used for this situation.
Recommend actions that would lead to the desired change.
Advocacy Letter for Jennifer Scott: Addressing Ethical Challenges in Juvenile Justice
Advocacy Letter for Jennifer Scott: Addressing Ethical Challenges in Juvenile Justice
Dear Judge,
I am writing to advocate for Jennifer Scott, a juvenile under my supervision, whose situation requires careful consideration of ethical challenges that may impact her rehabilitation and successful reintegration into society. Jennifer's background reveals a history of family conflict, substance abuse, and academic struggles, all of which have contributed to her involvement with the justice system.
Client's Situation and Major Risk Factors:
Jennifer Scott, a 16-year-old, comes from a broken home with a history of domestic violence and substance abuse. Her academic performance has suffered due to frequent school transfers and lack of stable support systems. Jennifer's risk factors include exposure to trauma, peer influence towards delinquent behavior, and limited access to mental health resources.
Identified Ethical Challenge:
One ethical challenge that significantly affects Jennifer's case is the potential conflict between her right to confidentiality and the need for information sharing among stakeholders involved in her supervision and treatment. Balancing the protection of Jennifer's privacy with the necessity of collaboration and communication poses a complex ethical dilemma.
Ethical Strategies to Address the Challenge:
1. Informed Consent: Prioritize obtaining Jennifer's informed consent for sharing relevant information with other professionals involved in her case to respect her autonomy and privacy rights.
2. Confidentiality Agreements: Establish clear confidentiality agreements with Jennifer and all involved parties to outline the limits of information sharing and ensure that sensitive data is handled appropriately.
3. Ethical Decision-Making Framework: Utilize an ethical decision-making framework that considers Jennifer's best interests, legal obligations, and professional responsibilities when navigating confidentiality issues in her case.
Role as an Advocate:
As Jennifer's probation officer, my role as an advocate is to ensure that her rights are protected, her needs are addressed comprehensively, and her rehabilitation goals are pursued with a focus on ethical considerations. I must advocate for a holistic approach that considers Jennifer's individual circumstances, strengths, and challenges to promote her successful reentry into the community.
Advocacy in Action:
Advocacy can be a powerful tool in Jennifer's case by amplifying her voice, addressing systemic barriers to her rehabilitation, and promoting ethical practices in juvenile justice. By advocating for trauma-informed care, educational support, mental health services, and community resources, I can help create a supportive environment for Jennifer's growth and development.
Recommendations for Desired Change:
1. Comprehensive Assessment: Conduct a thorough assessment of Jennifer's needs, strengths, and risks to inform a tailored intervention plan that addresses her unique circumstances.
2. Collaborative Approach: Foster collaboration among stakeholders, including family members, educators, mental health providers, and community organizations, to create a cohesive support network for Jennifer.
3. Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation: Implement regular monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to track Jennifer's progress, adjust intervention strategies as needed, and ensure that ethical standards are upheld throughout her supervision.
In conclusion, ethical challenges in juvenile justice require a thoughtful and proactive approach to safeguard the well-being of young individuals like Jennifer Scott. By addressing confidentiality dilemmas with ethical strategies, advocating for Jennifer's rights, and recommending actions that prioritize her rehabilitation, we can work towards positive outcomes for Jennifer and promote a more ethical and effective juvenile justice system.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Juvenile Court Probation Officer