Analysis of your Locus of Control, Least Preferred Co-Worker, and Path-Goal
The purpose of this paper is for you to discover more about your dominant leadership styles and how others may view you in organizational leadership settings. The Locus of Control (LOC), Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC), and Path-Goal (PG) survey scales help to reveal information about your natural leadership style from three different perspectives. You will need to have completed the three surveys and work from the score results that are in D2L’s ‘Grades’ section. As you study your results look for what similarities and contrasts exist between the three survey results. Do you agree with your results from the surveys or not so much?
Research Paper Format
Section 1: Locus of Control (LOC)
• Do you feel that your LOC score result describes you accurately in a workplace setting?
If the LOC score does – please explain, if not – please explain.
• What do you think a future employer would learn about you from your score?
• Could a person’s LOC score be significantly different years into the future than what is now after gaining years of additional life and work experience?
• Why would someone want to work on changing their score?
Section 2: Least Preferred Coworker (LPC)
• Do you feel that your LPC score result describes you accurately in a workplace setting?
If the LPC score does – please explain, if not – please explain.
• What do you think a future employer would learn about you from your score?
• Could a person’s LPC score be significantly different years into the future than what is now after gaining years of additional life and work experience?
• Why would someone want to work on changing their score?
Section 3: Path Goal (PG)
• Do you feel that your PG score results describe you accurately in the areas of providing Direction, being Supportive, helping by Participation, and encouraging Achievement?
If you do – please explain all four areas separately, if not – please explain all four areas separately.
• What do you think a future employer who is looking for leaders to hire would learn about you from your four scores?
• Could a person’s four PG scores be significantly different years into the future than what is now after gaining years of additional life and work experiences?
Analysis of Locus of Control, Least Preferred Co-Worker, and Path-Goal
Section 1: Locus of Control (LOC)
In regards to my Locus of Control (LOC) score result, I do feel that it accurately describes me in a workplace setting. My score indicates that I have an internal locus of control, meaning that I believe I have control over my own actions and outcomes. This aligns with how I approach work, as I tend to take responsibility for my actions and believe that my efforts can directly influence the results I achieve.
A future employer would likely learn that I am self-motivated, proactive, and take ownership of my work based on my LOC score. They would see that I am someone who is driven by a sense of personal responsibility and has a belief in my ability to make a difference.
It is possible for a person's LOC score to change over time after gaining additional life and work experience. As individuals encounter different situations and challenges, they may develop a greater sense of control or, conversely, experience circumstances that lead to a more external locus of control. Life experiences can shape our beliefs and perspectives, which in turn can impact our locus of control.
Working on changing one's LOC score can be beneficial for individuals who feel that they have an excessively internal or external locus of control. Developing a more balanced perspective can help individuals navigate different situations more effectively. For example, someone with an extreme internal locus of control may benefit from understanding that certain factors are beyond their control and learning to adapt to unexpected circumstances.
Section 2: Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC)
Regarding my Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) score result, I also believe it accurately describes me in a workplace setting. My score indicates that I have a more task-oriented leadership style. I tend to focus on the job at hand and prioritize achieving objectives efficiently.
A future employer would likely learn from my LPC score that I am someone who values productivity, efficiency, and task completion. They would see that I am comfortable taking charge and driving the team towards achieving goals.
Similar to the LOC score, a person's LPC score can change over time with additional life and work experiences. As individuals gain more experience and exposure to different leadership styles, they may develop a more nuanced approach to working with others. They may become more adaptable and flexible in their leadership style based on the needs of the team or organization.
Working on changing one's LPC score can be valuable for individuals who want to improve their ability to work collaboratively and build strong relationships with colleagues. Developing skills in areas such as empathy, effective communication, and conflict resolution can help individuals become more versatile leaders who can effectively balance task-oriented goals with interpersonal relationships.
Section 3: Path Goal (PG)
In terms of my Path Goal (PG) score results, I do feel that they describe me accurately in the areas of providing Direction, being Supportive, helping by Participation, and encouraging Achievement.
Providing Direction: My score indicates that I am effective in providing clear guidance and setting expectations for my team. I believe in establishing a clear vision and providing the necessary direction for individuals to achieve their goals.
Being Supportive: My score suggests that I prioritize creating a supportive and positive work environment. I value building relationships with team members, offering assistance when needed, and providing encouragement.
Helping by Participation: My score indicates that I am willing to actively participate in tasks alongside my team members. I believe in leading by example and being hands-on when necessary to support the team's efforts.
Encouraging Achievement: My score suggests that I believe in recognizing and rewarding individual and team achievements. I understand the importance of motivating and inspiring others to reach their full potential.
A future employer who is looking for leaders to hire would learn from my four scores that I possess a well-rounded approach to leadership. They would see that I prioritize providing direction while also being supportive, actively participating, and encouraging achievement. These scores indicate that I strive for both task accomplishment and the development and well-being of my team members.
Similar to the previous sections, a person's four PG scores can change over time as they gain more life and work experiences. Leadership skills can be developed and refined through various opportunities for growth and learning. As individuals encounter different situations and challenges, they may adapt their leadership style to accommodate the needs of their team or organization.
In conclusion,
understanding one's Locus of Control, Least Preferred Co-Worker style, and Path-Goal scores can provide valuable insights into one's natural leadership tendencies. While these scores are not definitive or static representations of one's leadership abilities, they offer a starting point for self-reflection and growth. By recognizing our strengths and areas for improvement, we can continue to develop our leadership skills and become more effective leaders in organizational settings.