Analyzing Common Core: A Perspective from Adler, Popham, Apple, and Flinders

  Title: Analyzing Common Core: A Perspective from Adler, Popham, Apple, and Flinders Introduction The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) have been a subject of debate since their implementation in the United States. This essay aims to explore how Alfred Adler's perspective on education, as well as the objectives discussed by W. James Popham, support or challenge the structure of the Common Core as described by David Karp. Additionally, we will consider Michael Apple's characterization of curriculum as a means of control and how it aligns with the reconceptualization of curriculum theory discussed in the introduction to part III of the Flinders text. Thesis Statement While Common Core aligns with some aspects of Adler's and Popham's objectives, it falls short in providing a well-rounded education. Moreover, Apple's critique of curriculum as a means of control resonates with the need to reconceptualize curriculum theory in order to create a more inclusive and empowering education system. Adler's Perspective on Education Alfred Adler emphasized the importance of holistic education that focuses on the development of the whole individual. Adler believed that education should nurture social interest, encourage collaboration, and foster a sense of belonging within a community. From Adler's perspective, the structure of Common Core can be seen as both positive and negative. On one hand, Common Core aims to provide consistent learning objectives across states, promoting equity and ensuring that all students have access to the same educational standards. This aligns with Adler's goal of fostering a sense of belonging and promoting social interest. However, Adler also emphasized the importance of individuality and tailoring education to meet each student's unique needs and abilities. The standardized nature of Common Core may limit educators' flexibility in adapting instruction to individual students, potentially hindering their overall development. Popham's Objectives W. James Popham highlighted several objectives for education, including the development of critical thinking skills, fostering creativity, and promoting lifelong learning. Common Core partially satisfies these objectives but falls short in some areas. While Common Core places an emphasis on critical thinking and problem-solving skills, it heavily relies on standardized tests to measure student performance. This narrow focus on test scores may hinder educators' ability to foster creativity and instill a love for lifelong learning in students. Popham also emphasized the importance of formative assessment, which allows educators to gauge students' progress throughout their learning journey. However, the heavy reliance on summative assessments in Common Core may limit the effectiveness of formative assessment practices. Apple's Critique of Curriculum as Control Michael Apple argued that curriculum functions as a means of control, perpetuating social inequalities and serving the interests of dominant groups. Apple's critique aligns with concerns regarding the Common Core's standardized nature. The one-size-fits-all approach of Common Core may perpetuate existing inequalities by disregarding cultural, linguistic, and individual differences among students. By enforcing a rigid curriculum, Common Core limits educators' ability to incorporate diverse perspectives and experiences into their teaching. Apple's critique supports the need for reconceptualizing curriculum theory, as discussed in the introduction to part III of the Flinders text. This reconceptualization aims to create a more inclusive and empowering curriculum that recognizes and values students' diverse backgrounds and experiences. Conclusion In conclusion, while Common Core aligns with some aspects of Adler's and Popham's objectives, it falls short in providing a well-rounded education. The standardized nature of Common Core may hinder individualized instruction and limit educators' ability to foster creativity and lifelong learning. Furthermore, Apple's critique of curriculum as control resonates with the need to reconceptualize curriculum theory to create a more inclusive and empowering education system. By recognizing and valuing students' diverse backgrounds and experiences, we can work towards an educational approach that promotes social equity and fosters the holistic development of every individual.

Sample Answer