Analyzing the Transfer Pricing Dilemma at Sky Armour Industries

Sky Armour Industries manufactures high-grade aluminum luggage made from recycled metal. The company operates two divisions: metal recycling and luggage fabrication. Each division operates as a decentralized entity. The metal recycling division is free to sell sheet aluminum to outside buyers, and the luggage fabrication division is free to purchase recycled sheet aluminum from other sources. Currently, however, the recycling division sells all of its output to the fabrication division, and the fabrication division does not purchase materials from any outside suppliers.

Aluminum is transferred from the recycling division to the fabrication division at 110% of full cost. The recycling division purchases recyclable aluminum for $0.50 per pound. The divisions other variable costs equal $2.80 per pound, and fixed costs at a monthly production level of 50,000 pounds are $1.50 per pound. During the most recent month, 50,000 pounds of aluminum were transferred between the two divisions. The recycling divisions capacity is 70,000 pounds.

Due to increased demand, the fabrication division expects to use 60,000 pounds of aluminum next month. Metalife Corporation has offered to sell 10,000 pounds of recycled aluminum next month to the fabrication division for $5.00 per pound.

Calculate the transfer price during the most recent month per pound of recycled aluminum.
Assuming that each division is considered a profit center, would the fabrication manager choose to purchase 10,000 pounds next month from Metalife?
Is the purchase in the best interest of Sky Armour Industries? Show your calculations.
What is the cause of this goal incongruence?
The fabrication division manager suggests that $5.00 is now the market price for recycled sheet aluminum and that this should be the new transfer price. Sky Armour Industries corporate management tends to agree. The metal recycling manager is suspicious. Metalifes prices have always been considerably higher than $5.00 per pound.

Why the sudden price cut? After further investigation by the recycling division manager, it is revealed that the $5.00 per pound price was a one-time-only offer made to the fabrication division due to excess inventory at Metalife. Future orders would be priced at $5.50 per pound.

Elaborate on the validity of the $5.00 per pound market price and the ethics of the fabrication manager.
Would changing the transfer price to $5.00 matter to Sky Armour Industries?

  Analyzing the Transfer Pricing Dilemma at Sky Armour Industries 1. Calculation of Transfer Price per Pound of Recycled Aluminum: - Full cost per pound = Variable costs + Fixed costs = $2.80 + $1.50 = $4.30 - Transfer price = 110% of full cost = 110% * $4.30 = $4.73 per pound 2. Decision on Purchasing Aluminum from Metalife: - Metalife offers 10,000 pounds at $5.00 per pound - Total cost of purchasing from Metalife = 10,000 * $5.00 = $50,000 - Internal transfer cost for 10,000 pounds = 10,000 * $4.73 = $47,300 - The fabrication manager would choose to purchase from Metalife as the cost is higher but within reason. 3. Evaluation of Purchase Decision: - The purchase is in the best interest of Sky Armour Industries as it fulfills the increased demand and allows the fabrication division to meet its production requirements efficiently. 4. Cause of Goal Incongruence: - The goal incongruence arises from the decentralized structure of the divisions, where each operates independently, potentially leading to suboptimal decisions for the overall company. 5. Validity and Ethics of Transfer Pricing: - The sudden price cut of $5.00 per pound may not reflect the true market price, as Metalife's regular pricing is higher. - The fabrication manager's ethics are questionable if they push for a lower transfer price based on a one-time offer, potentially compromising the company's long-term interests for short-term gains. 6. Impact of Changing Transfer Price to $5.00: - Changing the transfer price to $5.00 per pound may lead to increased costs for the fabrication division and reduced profits for the overall company if Metalife returns to its regular pricing of $5.50 per pound. In conclusion, the transfer pricing dilemma at Sky Armour Industries underscores the importance of aligning divisional goals with the company's overarching objectives. Decisions regarding transfer pricing should be based on long-term sustainability and ethical considerations to ensure the company's profitability and reputation are maintained in the market.  

Sample Answer