Aversive Procedures: Escape Extinction

Aversive Procedures: Escape Extinction Treatment Description Escape extinction is an aversive procedure used in behavior analysis that involves preventing an individual from escaping or avoiding an aversive stimulus or situation. The treatment aims to decrease undesirable behaviors by eliminating the escape or avoidance response, thereby reducing the reinforcement that maintains those behaviors. The procedure typically involves the following steps: Identify the specific behavior to be targeted for reduction. Implement a task or demand that elicits the undesirable behavior. Ensure that the individual cannot escape or avoid the demand until the undesirable behavior stops. As soon as the undesirable behavior ceases, remove the demand and provide reinforcement or a break. Pro Statements Supporting Escape Extinction Effective Behavior Change: Escape extinction has been found to be effective in reducing problem behaviors, especially those that are maintained by escape or avoidance reinforcement (Piazza et al., 1997). Individualized Approach: Escape extinction allows for a tailored treatment approach, as it is based on identifying and targeting specific problem behaviors. Learning Opportunity: By not allowing escape from aversive situations, escape extinction provides individuals with the opportunity to learn alternative, more appropriate behaviors for coping with challenging situations. Con Statements Opposing Escape Extinction Ethical Concerns: Some argue that escape extinction can be ethically problematic, as it involves intentionally subjecting individuals to aversive stimuli or situations. Emotional Impact: Critics argue that escape extinction may lead to increased emotional distress and frustration for the individual undergoing the treatment. Limited Generalization: Some studies suggest that while escape extinction may reduce problem behaviors in specific contexts, it may not lead to generalized improvements across different settings or situations (Lerman & Iwata, 1995). Evaluation of Findings Escape extinction is a controversial aversive procedure that has both proponents and opponents. While proponents argue for its effectiveness in behavior change and individualized treatment, opponents raise concerns about its ethical implications and potential negative emotional impact. In terms of ethical considerations, escape extinction should be implemented with careful consideration of the potential harm it may cause to individuals. It is essential to balance the potential benefits of behavior reduction with the potential negative effects on emotional well-being. Regarding relevant ethics codes, the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) provides guidelines for professional conduct in behavior analysis. Four relevant ethics codes from the BACB include: Responsibility to Clients: Behavior analysts must prioritize the welfare and best interests of their clients while considering the potential risks and benefits of interventions. Least Restrictive Alternative: Behavior analysts should use the least restrictive procedures necessary to effectively address problem behaviors, taking into account individual preferences and needs. Integrity: Behavior analysts should be truthful, honest, and transparent in their professional practice, including discussing potential risks and benefits with clients or their guardians. Professional Competence: Behavior analysts have a responsibility to maintain competence in their practice and stay informed about current research and ethical standards in their field. In summary, escape extinction is an aversive procedure used in behavior analysis to reduce problem behaviors by eliminating the escape response. While it has its proponents who emphasize its effectiveness and individualized approach, opponents raise concerns about ethics and potential emotional impact. When implementing escape extinction, it is crucial to consider the ethics codes provided by the BACB to ensure responsible and ethical practice.  

Sample Answer