Bleeding Kansas

  1. "Bleeding Kansas" pages 425-428
    A. Summarize the main points of the section.
    B. In your opinion, in what ways did the growing violence predict the coming of the Civil War? Examine the cases of Lawrence, Kansas; John Brown's raid at Pottawatomie Creek; and, the Sumner-Brooks affair in your response.
  2. The Dred Scott Decision pages 430-432
    A. Summarize the main points of the section.
    B. In your opinion, what does the decision tell us about the U.S. in the 1850s and the "uproar" the decision created?
  Bleeding Kansas A. Summary of the Main Points: The section on "Bleeding Kansas" (pages 425-428) highlights the violent and turbulent events that unfolded in the Kansas Territory during the mid-1850s. The territory became a battleground between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces, as both groups sought to influence the outcome of whether Kansas would enter the Union as a free or slave state. The conflict escalated as armed groups clashed, leading to widespread violence, bloodshed, and political unrest. Notable events included the sack of Lawrence by pro-slavery forces, John Brown's raid at Pottawatomie Creek where he and his followers killed several pro-slavery settlers, and the Sumner-Brooks affair involving the violent confrontation between Senator Charles Sumner and Representative Preston Brooks on the Senate floor. B. Analysis of the Impact on the Civil War: The growing violence in "Bleeding Kansas" served as a precursor to the Civil War in several ways: 1. Lawrence, Kansas: The sack of Lawrence exemplified the extreme measures taken by pro-slavery factions to suppress anti-slavery sentiments. The attack highlighted the deep-rooted divisions and tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery, foreshadowing the broader conflict to come. 2. John Brown's Raid at Pottawatomie Creek: John Brown's violent actions in Pottawatomie Creek underscored the radicalization of abolitionist sentiments and the willingness of some individuals to resort to armed resistance against slavery. The raid symbolized the escalating extremism and polarization that would characterize the Civil War era. 3. Sumner-Brooks Affair: The brutal assault on Senator Charles Sumner by Representative Preston Brooks reflected the breakdown of civility and compromise in national politics. The incident exposed the deep-seated animosities between abolitionists and pro-slavery advocates, highlighting the inability to resolve conflicts peacefully and setting the stage for further confrontations. Overall, the events in "Bleeding Kansas" demonstrated how entrenched ideological differences, escalating violence, and political radicalization contributed to the growing tensions that ultimately erupted into the Civil War. The Dred Scott Decision A. Summary of the Main Points: The section on the Dred Scott Decision (pages 430-432) discusses the landmark Supreme Court ruling in the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott, an enslaved African American, had sued for his freedom on the basis of having lived in free territories with his master. The Supreme Court's decision, written by Chief Justice Roger Taney, declared that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens under the U.S. Constitution and therefore could not file lawsuits in federal courts. B. Analysis of the Impact on U.S. Society in the 1850s: The Dred Scott Decision revealed several critical aspects of U.S. society in the 1850s: 1. Legalized Inequality: By denying African Americans citizenship rights and legal protections, the decision institutionalized racial inequality and reinforced the notion of African Americans as inferior beings. This legal sanction of inequality further entrenched divisions within American society along racial lines. 2. Intensified Sectional Tensions: The Dred Scott Decision exacerbated existing sectional tensions by inflaming debates over slavery expansion into the territories. The ruling effectively invalidated popular sovereignty and emboldened pro-slavery advocates, leading to heightened conflicts between North and South over the future of slavery in America. 3. "Uproar" and Backlash: The decision sparked widespread outrage and condemnation from abolitionists, anti-slavery activists, and many Northerners who viewed it as a grave injustice. The uproar reflected deep moral and political divisions within the country, fueling anti-slavery sentiments and galvanizing opposition to the institution of slavery. In conclusion, the Dred Scott Decision not only underscored the deeply entrenched racism and inequality prevalent in American society but also intensified sectional tensions, contributing to the volatility and unrest that characterized the lead-up to the Civil War in the 1850s.    

Sample Answer