Categorizing Project Risks and Examples for a Fundraising Project

Chapter 11: Discussion Questions

  1. List three methods that can be used for categorizing project risks. For a fundraising project, give examples of risk using each categorizing method.
  2. To help identify risks, what are some questions a project manager could ask when reviewing the project charter and WBS?
  3. List and describe at least three common quantitative risk analysis techniques. Under what circumstances would you find each one useful?
  Categorizing Project Risks and Examples for a Fundraising Project There are several methods that can be used for categorizing project risks. Here are three commonly used methods, along with examples of risks that could arise in a fundraising project: a. Internal vs. External Risks: Internal Risks: These are risks that originate within the project or the organization itself. Example: Lack of fundraising expertise within the project team. External Risks: These are risks that come from external factors outside the control of the project team. Example: Economic downturn affecting potential donors’ ability to contribute. b. Project Phase Risks: Initiation Phase Risks: These are risks that impact the early stages of the project, such as project approval and funding. Example: Difficulty securing initial funding for the fundraising project. Planning Phase Risks: These are risks related to the development of project plans and strategies. Example: Inaccurate estimation of fundraising targets and costs. Execution/Implementation Phase Risks: These are risks that arise during the actual execution of the fundraising activities. Example: Low turnout at fundraising events due to poor marketing or lack of community engagement. Monitoring and Control Phase Risks: These are risks associated with tracking project progress and making necessary adjustments. Example: Inadequate tracking of fundraising activities, leading to missed opportunities. c. Risk Impact: High-Impact Risks: These are risks that could have significant consequences if they occur. Example: Major donor withdrawal or loss of key fundraising staff. Medium-Impact Risks: These are risks that could have moderate consequences on the project. Example: Delays in receiving pledged donations from sponsors. Low-Impact Risks: These are risks that would have minimal impact on the project if they occur. Example: Minor changes in fundraising event schedules. Questions for Identifying Risks when Reviewing Project Charter and WBS: What are the key objectives and deliverables of the project? Are there any assumptions made in the project charter or WBS that could pose risks if they are not met? Are there any dependencies between tasks or activities that could result in delays or potential bottlenecks? Are there any external factors or stakeholders that could introduce risks to the project? Are there any regulatory or compliance requirements that need to be considered for risk management? Are there any resource constraints or limitations that could impact the project’s success? Common Quantitative Risk Analysis Techniques and their Usefulness: a. Monte Carlo Simulation: This technique involves running multiple simulations using random values for various risk factors to assess the overall impact on project outcomes. It helps in determining the probability of achieving specific project objectives or targets. It is useful when dealing with complex projects with multiple uncertainties. b. Sensitivity Analysis: This technique involves analyzing how changes in individual risk factors or variables affect project outcomes. It helps identify the most influential risks and prioritize them for mitigation. It is useful when trying to understand which risks have the greatest impact on project success. c. Decision Tree Analysis: This technique uses a graphical representation of decisions and uncertainties to evaluate different possible outcomes and their associated probabilities. It helps in making informed decisions by considering various alternatives and their potential risks and rewards. It is useful when dealing with projects where decisions depend on uncertain events or conditions. d. Expected Monetary Value (EMV) Analysis: This technique involves calculating the expected monetary value of different project outcomes by multiplying each outcome’s probability by its associated monetary value. It helps in assessing the overall financial impact of risks and can aid decision-making based on potential financial gains or losses. It is useful when considering risks that have financial implications. In summary, categorizing project risks can be done using various methods such as internal vs. external risks, project phase risks, and risk impact. When reviewing the project charter and WBS, project managers can ask questions related to objectives, assumptions, dependencies, external factors, compliance requirements, and resource constraints to identify potential risks. Quantitative risk analysis techniques like Monte Carlo Simulation, Sensitivity Analysis, Decision Tree Analysis, and Expected Monetary Value (EMV) Analysis can be used under different circumstances to assess and mitigate project risks.

Sample Answer