Research a cost control policy that is in effect at your organization or one that you research. In doing so, you will detail the impact this policy has on the organization, its unintended consequences, and a possible alternative. All healthcare organizations must be aware of cost controls, regardless of nonprofit or for-profit status. Managing costs at all levels of the organization affects the bottom line, which has a direct effect on all aspects of the organization. This assessment is designed to help you analyze why organizational policies are put in place. In addition, it will help you understand the role of operations in a healthcare setting, which is to ensure a high quality of care is maintained across all departments.Health care organization could be a hospital system like Banner Health or a skilled nursing facility located in your town, or a surgical outpatient clinic. You should choose one facility and pick one policy and write a cohesive paper or power point about it. You should NOT choose a federal generic broad policy like Obama Care/Affordable Care Act or Medicare or Medicaid.You are working in an organization that is conducting an audit of a determined number of policies to determine if they are effective in their current state or if improvements and updates are needed (and alternatives need to be created). Your first step is to find a policy at a healthcare organization related to cost controls. Include the following in your report.Summarize the details of the policy: When was the policy put in place? Was it adopted system-wide, in one department, or multiple departments? What does the policy address? What is the potential impact of not following the policy at the organizational level? Unit level? Individual level? Explain how the policy impacts fiscal aspects of the organization:How does the policy act as a cost control?Describe how the policy impacts the quality of patient care: Does the policy improve efficiency? Are the goals to improve care and reduce costs? Explore the unintended consequences: What secondary impacts does the policy have on the organization? Unit? Staff? Patient?Does the policy need revision? Suggest alternatives to the policy: In your opinion, is the policy the best way to address the issue? Support your position by explaining why or why not.
Cost Control Policy Analysis: Supply Chain Management at Banner Health
Cost Control Policy Analysis: Supply Chain Management at Banner Health
Introduction
In the complex realm of healthcare, cost control policies are essential to maintaining financial stability while ensuring high-quality patient care. This essay focuses on the supply chain management policy implemented at Banner Health, a large nonprofit healthcare system in the United States. The policy aims to optimize the procurement and management of medical supplies and equipment, thereby reducing operational costs. However, this policy has both intended and unintended consequences that warrant examination. Ultimately, this analysis will propose alternatives to enhance its effectiveness.
Summary of the Policy
Policy Details
The supply chain management policy at Banner Health was instituted in 2017 and has been adopted system-wide across various departments, including emergency services, surgical units, and outpatient clinics. The policy addresses the procurement process for medical supplies, emphasizing standardized purchasing agreements with preferred vendors, inventory management practices, and a focus on technology-driven solutions for tracking supplies.
Potential Impact of Non-Compliance
Failure to adhere to this policy can have significant repercussions on multiple levels:
- Organizational Level: Non-compliance can lead to increased operational costs due to inefficient procurement practices and potential over-reliance on emergency suppliers.
- Unit Level: Individual departments may face shortages or surpluses of necessary supplies, disrupting patient care delivery.
- Individual Level: Staff may experience increased stress and frustration if they encounter delays or shortages in critical medical supplies, impacting their ability to provide timely care.
Fiscal Impact of the Policy
Cost Control Mechanisms
The supply chain management policy functions as a cost control mechanism by:
1. Standardization of Supplies: By negotiating contracts with preferred vendors, Banner Health can leverage bulk purchasing to reduce costs significantly.
2. Inventory Management: The use of advanced inventory tracking technology minimizes waste and ensures that departments only order what they need, further controlling costs.
3. Data Analytics: Continuous monitoring of supply usage helps identify trends and areas for cost reduction, enabling proactive decision-making.
Impact on Quality of Patient Care
This policy is designed to improve efficiency by ensuring that medical supplies are readily available when needed. However, its impact on patient care is multifaceted:
- Efficiency Gains: With an optimized supply chain, healthcare providers can focus more on patient care rather than managing inventory.
- Goals Alignment: The dual objectives of reducing costs while improving care quality are intertwined; effective supply management supports both goals by ensuring resources are available without unnecessary expenditure.
Unintended Consequences
While the supply chain management policy has positive outcomes, it also presents several unintended consequences:
1. Staff Burnout: The emphasis on strict adherence to standardized purchasing agreements may lead to frustration among staff who feel limited in their ability to procure necessary supplies quickly.
2. Quality Compromises: In some cases, the drive for cost reduction may result in the selection of lower-quality supplies, potentially compromising patient safety.
3. Reduced Flexibility: A rigid procurement framework can hinder a department's ability to adapt quickly to changing clinical needs or emergencies.
Need for Revision
Given the unintended consequences identified, it is evident that the supply chain management policy requires revision. While cost control is vital, a more balanced approach that considers quality and staff input would enhance its effectiveness.
Suggested Alternatives
Implementing a Flexible Procurement Framework
An alternative approach could involve creating a flexible procurement framework that allows departments to respond quickly to urgent needs while still adhering to cost-control measures. This could include:
1. Emergency Supply Protocols: Establishing a clear protocol for acquiring emergency supplies without lengthy approval processes could address immediate needs without compromising overall cost control.
2. Staff Input Mechanism: Engaging staff in feedback sessions regarding supply needs and challenges could provide valuable insights for refining procurement practices.
3. Supplier Diversity: Expanding the pool of suppliers beyond preferred vendors may facilitate access to higher-quality or more urgently needed items while still maintaining cost-effectiveness.
Conclusion
The supply chain management policy at Banner Health serves as a critical component of its cost control strategy. However, its unintended consequences necessitate careful reconsideration and revision. By implementing a more flexible and inclusive procurement framework, Banner Health can better balance cost control with quality patient care, ensuring that it meets the needs of both its staff and patients effectively. As healthcare continues to evolve, so too must the policies that govern it.