EABO (Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations) makes assumptions about future challenges, technology

EABO (Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations) makes assumptions about future challenges, technology, and what is required to best support the needs of national security. There are tradeoffs that the USMC must make in order to have enough resources to support EABOs. They must make the choices we discussed in Module 7 about buying more existing stuff, buying new stuff, and/or researching new things to buy in the future. Force design is about making connections among technology, threats, and missions. EABO attempts to do that for the future. From what we learned, does EABO get it right?

Full Answer Section

       

EABO's Assumptions:

  • Future Challenges: EABO assumes a future dominated by great power competition, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region, with potential adversaries possessing advanced anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities.
  • Technology: EABO relies on advancements in areas like long-range precision fires, unmanned systems, cyber warfare, and distributed logistics to enable small units to have a significant impact.
  • National Security Needs: EABO is designed to address the need for persistent presence, sea control, and the ability to project power in a contested environment, supporting broader national security objectives.

Tradeoffs and Force Design:

As you mentioned, EABO requires the USMC to make tough choices about resource allocation. They must balance investments in existing capabilities, new technologies, and future research. This is where Force Design 2030 comes in, attempting to connect technology, threats, and missions.

Arguments for EABO Getting it Right:

  • Adaptability: EABO's emphasis on small, mobile units aligns with the need to operate in a complex and unpredictable environment. It offers a more agile and adaptable approach compared to traditional large-scale deployments.
  • Relevance: EABO addresses the specific challenges posed by A2/AD environments, where large, fixed bases are vulnerable. It aims to create a more resilient and distributed force posture.
  • Innovation: EABO encourages the development and integration of new technologies, which can enhance the Marine Corps' capabilities and effectiveness.

Arguments Against EABO Getting it Right (or Potential Weaknesses):

  • Risk of Overreliance on Technology: EABO's success depends heavily on technological advancements. If these technologies don't mature as expected or are countered by adversaries, EABO's effectiveness could be limited.
  • Logistics Challenges: Sustaining small, dispersed units in a contested environment poses significant logistical challenges. EABO must develop innovative solutions for resupply, medical evacuation, and other critical needs.
  • Coordination and Command and Control: Effectively coordinating numerous small units across a vast battlespace requires robust command and control systems. Maintaining situational awareness and unity of effort could be difficult.
  • Vulnerability to Asymmetric Warfare: While EABO addresses conventional threats, it might be vulnerable to asymmetric tactics employed by adversaries, such as guerilla warfare or cyberattacks.
  • Unproven Concept: EABO is a relatively new concept, and its effectiveness has not been fully tested in real-world combat scenarios.

Conclusion:

EABO represents a significant shift in the USMC's approach to warfare, and it has the potential to be a game-changer. However, it's not without risks and challenges. Whether EABO "gets it right" ultimately depends on how well the Marine Corps can address the potential weaknesses and adapt to the evolving security environment.

Key Considerations:

  • Continuous Evaluation: EABO should be continuously evaluated and refined based on wargaming, exercises, and lessons learned.
  • Flexibility: The Marine Corps must remain flexible and adaptable, ready to adjust EABO as needed to meet new threats and challenges.
  • Integration: EABO must be effectively integrated with the Navy and other services to achieve its full potential.

Ultimately, EABO is a work in progress. Its success will depend on the Marine Corps' ability to innovate, adapt, and overcome the challenges inherent in this new approach to warfare.

Sample Answer

   

EABO (Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations) is a key component of the USMC's Force Design 2030, a major effort to modernize the Corps for future challenges. It's built on assumptions about the future operating environment, technology, and the needs of national security. Whether EABO "gets it right" is a complex question with no easy answer, but we can analyze its strengths and potential weaknesses based on what we've learned.

EABO's Core Idea:

EABO envisions small, mobile, and low-signature Marine units operating from a series of temporary, austere bases within a contested maritime environment. These bases would support sea control, sea denial, and fleet sustainment, enabling the Navy to project power in areas where traditional large-scale bases might be vulnerable