Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Paper Formatting
Double or single-spaced
1-inch margin
12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
300 words per page
No Lateness!
Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Our Guarantees
Free Unlimited revisions
Guaranteed Privacy
Money Return guarantee
Plagiarism Free Writing
English language proficiency standards necessary
. If content area standards are provided for every grade level, why are English language proficiency standards necessary? Research and explore English language proficiency/development standards for a state other than Arizona (e.g., WIDA standards). What similarities do you see between those standards and Arizona's ELP standards? Based on the comparison, what are the most important aspects of English language proficiency standards?
Which two language acquisition/learning theories (behaviorist, nativist, social interactionist, cognitive, etc.) best reflect your teaching style or the approach to teaching that you prefer? In what ways would each of these theories drive your teaching practice, as applied to ELs? How can these two theories be used simultaneously to enhance learning?
Full Answer Section
Essentially, content area standards tell us what students should know and be able to do in each subject, while ELP standards tell us how they should be able to demonstrate that knowledge and skills in English.
2. Research and Exploration of ELP Standards (Example: WIDA Standards)
WIDA (World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment) is a consortium that provides a framework for English language development across all content areas.
Key Features of WIDA Standards:
Focus on Can-Do Statements: WIDA emphasizes what students can do with the language across different language domains (listening, speaking, reading, writing).
Interconnectedness of Language: Recognizes that language development is integrated and interdependent across different skills.
Culturally and Linguistically Responsive: Emphasizes the importance of acknowledging and valuing students' linguistic and cultural backgrounds.
Developmentally Appropriate: Provides clear and specific expectations for English language development at different grade levels.
3. Similarities between WIDA Standards and Arizona's ELP Standards
Focus on Communication: Both sets of standards emphasize the importance of effective communication in all its forms (listening, speaking, reading, writing).
Grade-Level Expectations: Both provide clear and specific expectations for English language development at each grade level.
Emphasis on Academic Language: Both recognize the importance of developing academic language skills that are essential for success in school and beyond.
4. Most Important Aspects of ELP Standards
Clear and Measurable: ELP standards should be clear, concise, and measurable, providing a common framework for assessing student progress.
Culturally and Linguistically Responsive: Standards must be sensitive to the diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds of ELLs and avoid making assumptions about their prior knowledge or experiences.
Developmentally Appropriate: Standards should be challenging yet achievable for students at each grade level, allowing for appropriate differentiation and scaffolding.
Integration with Content Area Standards: ELP standards must be seamlessly integrated with content area standards to ensure that ELLs have the language skills they need to access and succeed in all subject areas.
5. Two Language Acquisition/Learning Theories and their Application in Teaching ELs
1. Social Interactionist Theory (Vygotsky):
Key Concepts: Language learning occurs through social interaction and communication with others. Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) highlights the importance of scaffolding and support from more knowledgeable others.
Classroom Application:
Encourage peer-to-peer interaction and collaborative learning activities.
Provide opportunities for authentic communication through pair and group work, discussions, and presentations.
Utilize scaffolding techniques such as modeling, prompting, and providing visual supports.
Create a supportive and inclusive classroom environment where students feel comfortable taking risks and communicating in English.
2. Cognitive Theory (Piaget):
Key Concepts: Language development is linked to cognitive development.Children actively construct their understanding of the world through interaction with their environment.
Classroom Application:
Provide hands-on learning experiences that engage students' cognitive abilities.
Connect language learning to real-world experiences and meaningful contexts.
Encourage students to explore, experiment, and discover new knowledge through inquiry-based learning.
Use visuals, manipulatives, and technology to support learning and make abstract concepts concrete.
Integrating the Two Theories:
A combined approach can create a rich and engaging learning environment for ELLs.
Social interaction can facilitate cognitive development, while cognitive engagement can enhance language acquisition.
For example, collaborative projects that involve problem-solving and communication provide opportunities for both social interaction and cognitive development.
Conclusion
ELP standards play a crucial role in ensuring that all students, including ELLs, have the opportunity to succeed academically.By understanding and applying relevant language acquisition theories, educators can create effective and engaging learning experiences that support the language and academic development of all students
Sample Answer
1. Why are English Language Proficiency Standards necessary even when content area standards exist for every grade level?
Content Area Standards focus on the academic knowledge and skills students are expected to acquire in specific subjects like math, science, and social studies.
English Language Proficiency Standards (ELP Standards) specifically address the English language skills that English Language Learners (ELLs) need to access and succeed in the general education curriculum.