Choose 3 of Entwistle’s models (Enemies, Spies, Rebuilders, Neutral Parties, Allies, Colonialists) and provide the critiques of these models.
Entwistle’s models
3 of Entwistle's models and their critiques:
Enemies
- Critique: This model is too simplistic and does not allow for any meaningful dialogue between psychology and Christianity. It also ignores the fact that there is much overlap between the two disciplines.
- Critique: This model is also too simplistic, as it sees psychology and Christianity as two separate entities that can be mined for information without any regard for their underlying worldviews. This can lead to the distortion of both disciplines.
- Critique: This model is more nuanced than the previous two, but it still has some flaws. It assumes that psychology and Christianity can be reconciled by simply removing the "errors" from each discipline. However, this is not always possible, as the two disciplines have different starting points and assumptions.
Sample Solution
Enemies- Critique: This model is too simplistic and does not allow for any meaningful dialogue between psychology and Christianity. It also ignores the fact that there is much overlap between the two disciplines.