South Africa
Conditions in South Africa are positive in some respects, but not as favorable in economic terms as in Mexico or the Philippines. The prevailing wage in South Africa is about $10/day. Furthermore, there is a strong union movement, meaning that there may be future demands for increases in wages and benefits.
The unions and the government have been working together on health and safety issues and environmental protections. Exposure to toxic chemicals in the workplace is not permitted at as high a level as in Mexico and the Philippines. Although the equipment necessary to reduce toxic chemicals to an acceptable level is not as costly as in the United States, this expense would not be incurred in the other two countries. Furthermore, there are requirements for a solvent recovery system, which also increases operation expenses.
YOUR TASK:
You have to decide how you would like to proceed. You should state your clear and specific decision of how to proceed after a careful, thoughtful and thorough Stakeholder Analysis. Additionally, you are to analyze your decision according to one of the Ethical Rules as presented in your text.
Decision:
After conducting a comprehensive Stakeholder Analysis, I have decided to proceed by investing in the necessary equipment to reduce toxic chemicals in the workplace to an acceptable level and implementing a solvent recovery system in South Africa. This decision aligns with the commitment to health and safety standards, environmental protection, and ethical business practices.
Analysis According to Utilitarianism Ethical Rule:
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focuses on maximizing overall happiness or utility for the greatest number of people. In this context, investing in equipment to reduce toxic chemicals and implementing a solvent recovery system in South Africa can be analyzed through a utilitarian lens.
By investing in these measures, the health and safety of workers will be significantly improved, reducing the risks of exposure to toxic chemicals in the workplace. This decision will benefit not only the employees but also their families and communities by promoting a healthier work environment. Additionally, implementing environmental protections will contribute to sustainability and reduce the negative impact on the surrounding ecosystem.
While these investments may incur additional operational expenses initially, the long-term benefits in terms of improved health outcomes, employee morale, and environmental sustainability outweigh the costs. The overall utility generated by prioritizing health, safety, and environmental protection justifies the decision to proceed with these measures in South Africa.
In conclusion, by adhering to the Utilitarian ethical rule and prioritizing the well-being of stakeholders, particularly employees and the environment, investing in equipment to reduce toxic chemicals and implementing a solvent recovery system in South Africa is not only ethically sound but also aligns with long-term sustainability and responsible business practices.