EU Law

  T​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​he word limit for this assignment is 1200 words, excluding the footnotes which should be used for OSCOLA referencing only. OSCOLA referencing only please!!! Here is the question: “The “supremacy [of European Union (EU) Law] principle” is alien to the UK constitutional system: not only did it originate outside that system, it also sits uncomfortably with established constitutional principles, most notably the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty… The “supremacy” of EU law had ceased to apply when the UK had left the EU and the Parliament had repealed the European Communities Act 1972.” Select Committee on the Constitution European Union (Withdrawal) Bill, 9th Report of Session 2017-19 - published 29 January 2018 - HL Paper 69, Chapter 5 In light of this statement, explain and critically discuss the creation, operation and limits of the supremacy of EU Law principle, supporting your answer with relevant Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) cases and academic commentary. You can briefly refer to, but do not discuss in detail the Brexit process in your answer. 1 https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldconst/69/6908.htm [accessed 4.12.2021] Foster, N., EU Law Directions, 7th edn, OUP, 2020. Chapter 5, Chapter 8.1 - 8.1.3.5 Conway, G., EU Law, Routledge, 2015. Chapters 6.1-6.5, 6.12-6.13. must be included in biblography . primary sources, secondary, academics debates and journal articles. Bibliography Legislation European Communities Act 1972, c. 68. Cases Assessment of the conformity to the Polish Constitution of selected provisions of the Treaty on European Union [2021] K 3/21. C 26/62 Van Gend en Loos v Netherlandse Administratie der Belastingen [1963] ECR 1. Case 11-70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft [1970] EU:C:1970:114. Case C-204​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​/21 Commission v Poland [2021] ECLI:EU:C:2021:878. Case C?791/19, EC v Poland [2021] ECLI:EU:C:2021:596 Costa v ENEL [1964] ECR 595. Judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal concerning the constitutionality of Poland’s accession to the European Union Union [2005] K 18/04. R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport (No 2) [1991] 1 AC 603. R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC 3. Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [2002] EWHC 195. Books Albi A, Bardutzky S (Eds.) National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, the Rule of Law (Springer, 2019). Conway G, EU Law (Routledge, 2015). Foster N, EU Law Directions (OUP, 2020). Journal Articles Akaliyski P, Welzel, Hien J, ‘A community of shared values? Dimensions and dynamics of cultural integration in the European Union’ (2022) 44(4) JEI 569-590. Calljon FB, ‘The dialectic relation between the national and the European constitutional identity in the framework of European Constitutional Law’ (2017) 3(3) EU Law Journal 10-24. Florea D, Gales N, ‘Polexit – Is the Exit of Poland from the EU a Viable Option?’ (2021) 8(1) EJLPA 29-38. Lindeboom J, ‘Why EU Law Claims Supremacy’ (2018) 38(2) OJLS 328-356. Polanski O, ‘Poland - 'Constitutional Tribunal Judgment K 3/21' - A continued assault on the integrity of the EU legal order’ (2022) 2(22) Public Law 344-347. Sadurski W, ‘Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler’ (2019) 11 HJR 63-84. Other Statista, ‘Poland's contributions to and receipts from the European Union budget from 2004 to 2020’ (Statista, 2021) Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1135294/poland-s-contributions-to-and-receipts-from-​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​the-eu-budget/ [Accessed 9 May 2022] and so on