Evaluating the Argument for Lowering the Drinking Age to 18

  Evaluating the Argument for Lowering the Drinking Age to 18 Shayna Herszage, in her article for The Yeshiva University Observer, presents a compelling case for lowering the drinking age to 18. While her arguments highlight important considerations, the debate surrounding the legal drinking age is complex and multifaceted. It is crucial to critically analyze the points made by Herszage and consider the broader implications of such a policy change. Agreeing with Herszage's Points Herszage raises valid points in support of lowering the drinking age to 18. She argues that setting the drinking age at 21 may lead to increased binge drinking among young adults, as it drives drinking underground and away from regulated environments. Lowering the drinking age could promote responsible alcohol consumption by allowing young adults to learn moderation in supervised settings. Additionally, the inconsistency in legal age requirements for alcohol consumption and other adult privileges, such as voting and military service, raises questions about the rationale behind maintaining a higher drinking age. Disagreeing with Herszage's Points While Herszage's arguments are compelling, there are counterpoints to consider. Lowering the drinking age to 18 could potentially lead to an increase in alcohol-related accidents and fatalities among younger individuals who may not have fully developed decision-making skills. The adolescent brain is still maturing at age 18, making young adults more susceptible to the negative effects of alcohol on cognitive functions and behavior. Maintaining a higher drinking age helps protect young adults from the immediate and long-term consequences of excessive alcohol consumption. Personal Perspective on the Drinking Age Considering the complexities of the issue, I believe that the drinking age should remain at 21. While lowering the drinking age could address some concerns related to binge drinking and legal inconsistencies, it is essential to prioritize public health and safety. Delaying access to alcohol until age 21 allows young adults more time to mature, make informed decisions, and develop responsible drinking habits. Moreover, enforcing stricter regulations on alcohol sales and promoting education on alcohol awareness can complement efforts to reduce harmful drinking behaviors among all age groups. Conclusion In conclusion, Shayna Herszage's argument for lowering the drinking age to 18 raises important considerations about alcohol policy and its impact on young adults. While her points highlight potential benefits of such a change, it is crucial to weigh the risks associated with early alcohol access and its implications on public health. Maintaining the drinking age at 21 strikes a balance between promoting responsible alcohol consumption and safeguarding the well-being of young adults. By addressing underlying factors contributing to excessive drinking behaviors and implementing comprehensive prevention strategies, society can work towards creating a safer and healthier environment for individuals of all ages.

Sample Answer