Many of the great films in American cinema were criticized for their depictions of violence. Joker, which led all films with 11 Academy Award nominations in 2020, was the subject of much scrutiny in regard to its depiction of violence. Despite insistence by multiple groups that the film not even be released, Joker grossed over $1 billion. In a time when shootings take place in schools, churches, supermarkets, and even movie theaters:
- Why do audiences still attend films that depict graphic acts of violence? In what ways does cinematic violence influence violent crime in society? Minimum word count 100
- Can cinematic violence exist wholly independent of real-life violence? Why or why not? Can audience members view cinematic violence without being affected by it? Why or why not? Minimum word count 100
- Research the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) Film Rating System. The MPAA board meets and determines the suitability of film material for the general public, most importantly children. If you were a board member, how would you alter the current rating system to reflect your views on the influence of cinematic violence in society? Minimum word count 100
- Explain how your changes would be enforced in movie theaters and online viewing platforms. Minimum word count 100
Answer each question in full sentences, support your point-of-view withe researched academic articles
Write your paper using MLA format, double spaced, include research in a works cited page
Save your work as a document and attach to the drop box. Grade based on quality, review grading rubric for more information.
1. Why do audiences still attend films that depict graphic acts of violence? In what ways does cinematic violence influence violent crime in society?
Audiences continue to attend films that depict graphic acts of violence for several reasons. Firstly, violence in cinema can be seen as a form of entertainment, providing an adrenaline rush and a temporary escape from reality. Additionally, some audience members may be drawn to films with violent content due to their fascination with the human psyche and exploration of darker themes. However, it is essential to distinguish between the depiction of violence in film and its influence on real-life violent crime.
Studies suggest that the relationship between cinematic violence and real-life violence is complex and multifaceted. While some research has found a correlation between exposure to violent media and increased aggression or desensitization, the causal link remains unclear. It is important to note that the vast majority of individuals who consume violent media do not engage in violent behavior. Other factors such as individual characteristics, family environment, and social influences play significant roles in determining behavior.
2. Can cinematic violence exist wholly independent of real-life violence? Why or why not? Can audience members view cinematic violence without being affected by it?
Cinematic violence can exist independently of real-life violence. Films are a form of artistic expression, and their portrayal of violence is often fictionalized and exaggerated for dramatic effect. While cinematic violence can elicit emotional responses and provoke discussions, it does not directly cause individuals to engage in violent behavior.
Audience members can view cinematic violence without being significantly affected by it. Research suggests that most individuals possess the ability to differentiate between fantasy and reality, understanding that the violence depicted on screen is fictional. However, vulnerable individuals, such as those with pre-existing aggressive tendencies or mental health issues, may be more susceptible to the influence of media violence. It is crucial to consider individual differences and other contextual factors that contribute to an individual’s response to cinematic violence.
3. If you were a board member of the MPAA, how would you alter the current rating system to reflect your views on the influence of cinematic violence in society?
As a board member of the MPAA, I would propose modifications to the current rating system to better reflect the influence of cinematic violence in society. These modifications would include:
- Implementing stricter criteria for films that depict graphic acts of violence. This would involve considering factors such as the intensity, frequency, and realism of the violence portrayed.
- Introducing an additional rating category specifically for films containing explicit or gratuitous violence. This would provide clearer guidance for parents and viewers who wish to avoid such content.
- Increasing transparency by providing detailed explanations for each film’s rating decision. This would help audiences understand the specific reasons behind a film’s classification and make informed decisions about viewing choices.
4. Explain how your changes would be enforced in movie theaters and online viewing platforms.
To enforce these changes in movie theaters and online viewing platforms, collaboration between the MPAA and relevant stakeholders would be necessary. The following steps could be taken:
- Movie theaters would be required to display clear signage about the rating system at ticket counters and entrances, educating patrons about the content they can expect in each category.
- Theater staff would receive training on the revised rating system to ensure accurate implementation and enforcement.
- Online platforms would need to incorporate the modified rating categories into their content classification systems. This could involve adding explicit tags or filters that allow users to easily identify and avoid films with excessive violence.
- Regular audits and monitoring by the MPAA would ensure compliance with the revised rating system across both movie theaters and online platforms.
Enforcing these changes would require cooperation from filmmakers, distributors, exhibitors, and online platforms to ensure consistent application of the rating system and maintain public trust in its effectiveness.