How the common law system facilitates slow legal change.

  1. Explain how the common law system facilitates slow legal change.
  2. Discuss the concept of employment at will. Then discuss the exceptions to employment at
    will based on contract law and public policy. What is your view of this rule? Do the
    public policy exceptions to the rule give enough protection to employees?
  3. Hazing may have both criminal and civil ramifications. Discuss this and how you would
    develop a hazing prevention program for your high school athletic program.
  4. Give three examples of types of contracts that must be in writing according to the Statute
    of Frauds.

Full Answer Section

       
    • Case-by-Case Development: Common law develops through a series of individual cases, which can be a slow and piecemeal process.  
    • In contrast to statutary law, that can make large and very sudden changes, common law changes via small adaptations of prior rulings.  

2. Employment At-Will

  • Concept:
    • "Employment at-will" is a legal doctrine stating that an employer or an employee can terminate the employment relationship at any time, for any reason (or no reason), with or without notice, unless there is a specific employment contract stating otherwise.
  • Exceptions:
    • Contract Law:
      • If an employee has an express or implied contract specifying a definite term of employment or limiting the reasons for termination, the at-will doctrine does not apply.
    • Public Policy:
      • Courts have recognized exceptions where termination violates fundamental public policy principles. Examples include:
        • Retaliation for reporting illegal activity (whistleblowing).  
        • Refusal to perform an illegal act.
        • Exercising a legal right (e.g., filing a workers' compensation claim).  
         
    • It is worth noting that some states have statutory exceptions to employment at will as well.  
  • My View:
    • The at-will doctrine provides flexibility for both employers and employees. However, it can also lead to unfairness, particularly for employees who may be terminated arbitrarily.  
    • The public policy exceptions offer some protection against abusive terminations.
    • Whether the public policy exceptions give enough protection, is debatable. It varies from state to state. While these exceptions are critical, their effectiveness can depend on:
      • The specific public policy recognized by the state.
      • The employee's ability to prove the violation.
      • The availability of legal resources.
    • It is my opinion that more could be done to secure employees security in the workplace, whilst also giving room to employers to make necessary workforce changes.
  • It is also very important to note, that the concept of "employment at will" is much less prominent, in many areas outside of the United States.

3. Hazing: Criminal and Civil Ramifications

  • Criminal Ramifications:
    • Hazing can involve acts that constitute criminal offenses, such as assault, battery, reckless endangerment, and even manslaughter.  
    • Criminal prosecution can result in fines, imprisonment, and a criminal record.
  • Civil Ramifications:
    • Victims of hazing can sue for damages, including:
      • Medical expenses.
      • Pain and suffering.
      • Emotional distress.
      • Punitive damages (in cases of egregious misconduct).  
    • Schools and organizations can also be held liable for hazing incidents if they knew or should have known about them and failed to take adequate preventative measures.  
  • Hazing Prevention Program:
    • Education:
      • Educate students, coaches, and staff about the dangers and legal consequences of hazing.  
      • Clearly define what constitutes hazing and emphasize that it is never acceptable.
    • Policy Development:
      • Establish a clear, written anti-hazing policy that prohibits all forms of hazing.
      • Outline reporting procedures and disciplinary actions for violations.
    • Reporting Mechanism:
      • Create a safe and confidential way for students to report hazing incidents.
      • Ensure that all reports are taken seriously and investigated thoroughly.
    • Culture Change:
      • Promote a culture of respect, teamwork, and inclusivity.
      • Encourage students to intervene if they witness hazing.
      • Incorporate team building acitivities that foster healthy group dynamics.
    • Oversight:
      • Have adults present at events where hazing could occur.
      • Regularly review hazing policy, and program to make sure it is still efficient.

4. Statute of Frauds: Contracts That Must Be in Writing

  • Statute of Frauds Basics:
    • The Statute of Frauds requires certain types of contracts to be in writing and signed to be enforceable.  
  • Examples:
    • Contracts for the sale of land: Agreements for the purchase or sale of real property.
    • Contracts that cannot be performed within one year: Agreements that, by their terms, cannot be completed within a year from the date they are made.
    • Contracts to answer for the debt of another (guaranty): Agreements where one person agrees to pay the debt of another person if they fail to do so.
    • Contracts made in consideration of marriage.
    • Contracts for the sale of goods over a certain dollar amount (Uniform Commercial Code).

Sample Answer

     

Common Law and Slow Legal Change

  • Common Law Basics:
    • The common law system is based on precedent (stare decisis), meaning courts are bound by previous decisions in similar cases.  
    • This system emphasizes stability and predictability in the law.  
    • Judges interpret and apply existing legal principles to new situations.  
  • Facilitating Slow Change:
    • Precedent's Restraint: The reliance on precedent creates a natural resistance to rapid change. Courts are hesitant to overturn established principles unless there's a compelling reason.  
    • Incremental Development: Legal change in the common law system typically occurs incrementally, as courts gradually refine and adapt existing principles to address evolving social norms and circumstances.  
    • Judicial Restraint: Judges are generally expected to exercise restraint and avoid making sweeping changes to the law.