How the three perspectives of sustainability influence (or perhaps should influence) your purchasing decisions

Full Answer Section

           

• What is its carbon footprint from manufacturing to disposal?

For example, when buying clothes, considering the environmental pillar means looking for garments made from materials like organic cotton, hemp, or recycled polyester, which have a smaller footprint than conventional cotton or synthetic fibers. It also means avoiding fast fashion, which relies on a constant cycle of cheap production, frequent consumption, and high waste.  

Social

  The social pillar centers on a company's impact on people and communities. This involves labor practices, human rights, and social equity. This is where your question about ethical factories comes in. For a product to be socially sustainable, the workers who made it should be paid a living wage, have safe working conditions, and not be subject to forced or child labor.

• The 2013 Rana Plaza factory collapse in Bangladesh, which killed over a thousand garment workers, brought this issue to the forefront of global consumer consciousness.
• This tragedy highlighted the often-hidden human cost of cheap clothing and has since fueled a movement toward greater supply chain transparency and consumer demand for ethically made apparel.

When you consider the social pillar in your purchasing decisions, you're looking for brands with certifications like Fair Trade or those that publish social responsibility reports, signaling that they're committed to the well-being of their employees and communities.  

Economic

  The economic pillar is often viewed through the lens of a company's long-term financial viability, but from a consumer perspective, it relates to the broader economic system. This includes fair prices for producers, local economic development, and avoiding practices that destabilize markets or exploit workers. While consumers don't typically have direct insight into a company's governance or financial transparency, their purchasing power influences these factors. By supporting businesses that prioritize the other two pillars, consumers send a clear message that responsible behavior is economically viable.

---

 

Marketing Sustainability: Exploitation or Education?

  Companies should not exploit their sustainability efforts for marketing purposes if it involves deceptive practices, a concept known as greenwashing. Greenwashing is when a company presents a misleading or unsubstantiated image of environmental or social responsibility to appeal to consumers who value sustainability.  

Why not exploit?

  Greenwashing is harmful for several reasons:

• It undermines consumer trust. When consumers discover a company's claims are false or exaggerated, it erodes their faith not only in that brand but in the entire concept of sustainable business.
• It distracts from real issues. By focusing on minor or irrelevant "green" initiatives (e.g., a plastic bottle company advertising that its product is recyclable while ignoring its massive carbon footprint), companies avoid accountability for their more significant negative impacts.

Sample Answer

      The three perspectives of sustainability—environmental, social, and economic—significantly influence purchasing decisions by providing a framework for evaluating a product's true cost and impact. Conscious consumers increasingly consider these factors, shifting their focus from just price and quality to a more holistic view of the product's lifecycle.  

The Three Pillars and Your Purchases

   

Environmental

  The environmental pillar focuses on a company's impact on the planet. This includes resource consumption, pollution, carbon footprint, and waste generation. For a consumer, this translates to questions like:

• Is this product made from recycled, renewable, or sustainably sourced materials?
• How much energy and water were used to produce it?