Impact of the Ten-Week Hiatus on Governing According to the Consent of the Governed

    Essay: The Impact of the Ten-Week Hiatus on Governing According to the Consent of the Governed Thesis Statement The ten-week hiatus between Election Day and the presidential inauguration, which allows the outgoing president to exercise full legal authority as a lame-duck, poses a significant obstacle to governing according to the consent of the governed due to the potential for controversial and adverse decisions. This structural provision can undermine the democratic principle of majority rule by enabling outgoing presidents to take actions that may not align with the will of the people. To address this flaw in the Constitution, reforms such as limiting the executive power of lame-duck presidents or implementing stricter oversight mechanisms during transition periods could be considered. Introduction The American Constitution, revered as a cornerstone of democracy, establishes a framework for governance that aims to reflect the will of the people. However, certain structural provisions within the Constitution can impede the realization of majority rule and governance according to the consent of the governed. One such provision is the ten-week hiatus between Election Day and the presidential inauguration, during which the outgoing president retains full legal authority as a lame-duck. This period raises concerns about the potential for controversial decisions that may not align with the wishes of the electorate, thus hindering the principle of governing by consent. The Impact of the Ten-Week Hiatus on Majority Rule The period between Election Day and the presidential inauguration serves a practical purpose, allowing for the functioning of the Electoral College and ensuring a smooth transition of power. However, this gap also grants outgoing presidents with significant power and influence during their final days in office. As seen in past instances like President Clinton's controversial pardon of Marc Rich, lame-duck presidents may exploit this authority to take actions that can have far-reaching consequences and spark public outcry. Such actions by outgoing presidents raise questions about the extent to which decisions made during this period truly represent the will of the people. The potential for controversial pardons, executive orders, or policy changes can undermine the democratic principle of majority rule, as these decisions are made by an administration that has already been rejected by voters in favor of a new leadership. Addressing Flaws in the Constitutional Provision To mitigate the risks posed by the ten-week hiatus and empower governance based on the consent of the governed, reforms could be considered to limit the executive power of lame-duck presidents. One possible solution is to impose restrictions on significant policy decisions or appointments during this transition period, ensuring that outgoing administrations do not take actions that could bind their successors or contradict the incoming administration's mandate. Additionally, enhancing oversight mechanisms and accountability measures during the transition period can help prevent abuses of power by lame-duck presidents. Increased transparency in decision-making processes and closer scrutiny of executive actions can uphold democratic principles and promote continuity in governance between administrations. Conclusion In conclusion, while the American Constitution lays the foundation for democracy and majority rule, certain structural provisions like the ten-week hiatus between Election Day and the presidential inauguration can present challenges to governing according to the consent of the governed. The empowerment of lame-duck presidents with full legal authority during this period raises concerns about their ability to make controversial decisions that may not reflect the will of the people. By considering reforms to limit executive power and enhance oversight mechanisms during transition periods, it is possible to address this flaw in the Constitution and strengthen democracy by ensuring that governance truly aligns with the consent of the governed.

Sample Answer