Industrial governmental company

  Consider the following case: “Mr. Watson works as a human resources professional for an industrial governmental company called “ABC”. He had a friend and colleague who is called Mr. John who also works for “ABC”. Mr. Sam is another employee in the company “ABC”. Mr. Sam claimed that Mr. John had committed an inappropriate behaviour so Mr. Sam asked Mr. Watson to investigate this claim against Mr. John (the friend and collegue of Mr. Watson). Based on this case and on considering “conflict of interests” probability, answer the following: a) Explain whether Mr. Watson will commit a “conflict of interests” if he does not investigate the complaint (claim). (10 pts) b) Give an example of a “positive paradigm” in this case. (5 pts) c) Give an example of a “negative paradigm” in this case. (5 pts) d) Give 3 examples that can be neither positive paradigm nor negative paradigm. The examples should be briefly described and numbered. (15 pts) e) Use the “Line Drawing” method to show your observations in parts b), c), and d). (Refer to the cases in part (d) using their corresponding numbers according to how you numbered them.) (15 pts) Q2) (30 pts) Determine whether the following statements are True or False. Justify your answer briefly. Statement True or False? (5 pts) Justification (5 pts) a. Ethical dilemma refers to inquiries about how conflicting moral reflections related to resolving a moral problem should be balanced. b. Conflict of interest can be accepted in some special conditions. c. The minimalist view is one of the most desired attitudes towards professional responsibility. Q3) (20 pts) Explain briefly what is meant by the following: a) Obligation Responsibility (10 pts) b) Reclessly Causing Harm (10 pts)