Instrumentation Summary of the Six Research Studies

  Instrumentation Summary of the Six Research Studies This document summarizes the instrumentation utilized in six research studies, highlighting their validity, reliability, and practicality. The studies evaluated various health-related programs and initiatives through different methodologies, particularly focusing on cultural competency, mental health training, employee health, and participatory action research (PAR). 1. Boyle, M. H. (2019) - Cultural Competency in Hospice Care Instrumentation Used: - Cultural Competence Assessment Survey (CCAS): A validated tool assessing cultural competence among interdisciplinary teams in hospice care. Validity: The CCAS has established content and construct validity, ensuring that it accurately measures cultural competence in a healthcare setting. Reliability: The tool exhibits high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.80). Practicality: The survey is straightforward to administer online, making it accessible for large groups. 2. Glance, O. (2019) - Therapeutic Communication Training for Mental Health Nurses Instrumentation Used: - Therapeutic Communication Scale (TCS): A custom instrument developed to gauge communication skills before and after training sessions. Validity: The TCS was tested for face validity by experts in mental health nursing. Reliability: The instrument showed reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87. Practicality: The TCS is brief and can be easily integrated into training evaluations. 3. Perez, A. (2019) - Employee Health and Wellbeing Program Evaluation Instrumentation Used: - Wellbeing Index (WI): A comprehensive survey capturing various dimensions of employee wellbeing. Validity: The WI has undergone rigorous validation processes with a diverse employee sample. Reliability: High reliability scores (Cronbach's alpha > 0.90) indicate consistent results. Practicality: It is adaptable for different organizational settings and can be administered digitally. 4. Laster, K. W. (2018) - Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Education in Minority Women Instrumentation Used: - Health Literacy Assessment Tool (HLAT): A validated instrument used to evaluate health literacy levels pre- and post-intervention. Validity: Demonstrated strong construct validity through correlation with other health literacy measures. Reliability: High reliability with Cronbach's alpha of 0.85. Practicality: The HLAT is user-friendly and can be administered in community settings. 5. Patel, N. W. (2016) - Underutilization of a School-Based Health Center Instrumentation Used: - Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA): Designed to identify community health needs through surveys and focus groups. Validity: The CHNA tool has been validated through pilot testing in diverse populations. Reliability: Exhibits good reliability with a Cronbach's alpha around 0.80. Practicality: It allows for both quantitative and qualitative data collection, enhancing its effectiveness in community settings. 6. Tilman, D. P. (2014) - Participatory Action Research for Promoting Health Literacy Instrumentation Used: - Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ): A validated questionnaire to assess health literacy from multiple dimensions. Validity: The HLQ has been validated for use in various populations, ensuring comprehensive assessment capabilities. Reliability: Reliability coefficients exceed 0.85 across different domains of health literacy. Practicality: It is adaptable for both individual and group assessments within community health initiatives. Selected Instrumentation Among the instruments discussed, the Cultural Competence Assessment Survey (CCAS) by Boyle, M.H. stands out as the most appropriate in representing the constructs of interest across the studies focused on health interventions. Reasons for Selection: 1. Comprehensive Construct Measurement: The CCAS effectively assesses the multifaceted nature of cultural competence within healthcare teams, which is crucial given the growing diversity in patient populations. 2. Strong Validity and Reliability: With established content and construct validity, along with high internal consistency, this tool ensures that it accurately reflects the intended constructs without bias or measurement error. 3. Practical Application: Its online administration allows for efficient data collection across various settings, making it practical for large-scale evaluations similar to those in the other studies. Conclusion The instrumentation used across these six studies demonstrates a commitment to rigor and accuracy in evaluating health programs. Selecting an appropriate tool like the CCAS not only enhances the quality of research but also ensures that findings can effectively inform practice and policy in healthcare settings.    

Sample Answer