Investigators often face tension between striving to prove a case and uncovering the truth. Are these orientations fundamentally different, or can they coexist within investigative work? Choose one orientation, explain your perspective, and use a real or hypothetical case example to illustrate this approach's strengths and potential limitations.
No More Worries!
Paper Formatting
- Double or single-spaced
- 1-inch margin
- 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
- 300 words per page
No Lateness!
Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Our Guarantees
- Free Unlimited revisions
- Guaranteed Privacy
- Money Return guarantee
- Plagiarism Free Writing
Investigators often face tension between striving to prove a case and uncovering the truth
Full Answer Section
While this approach might take longer and require more resources, it increases the likelihood of identifying the true perpetrator and ensuring justice is served.
In conclusion, while the pressure to prove a case is often present, it should never overshadow the fundamental duty of an investigator to uncover the truth. By prioritizing truth-seeking, investigators can ensure the integrity of the justice system and protect the rights of all individuals involved.
Sample Answer
The tension between proving a case and uncovering the truth is a fundamental challenge in investigative work. While both are essential, I believe they can coexist, but the pursuit of truth should always be the primary objective.
An investigator focused solely on proving a case may be tempted to selectively gather evidence that supports their pre-conceived theory, ignoring or downplaying contradictory information.
This can lead to tunnel vision, confirmation bias, and potentially wrongful convictions. 1
1. Tunnel vision (metaphor) - Wikipedia
On the other hand, an investigator dedicated to uncovering the truth will meticulously examine all available evidence, regardless of whether it supports or contradicts their initial hypothesis. They will actively seek out alternative explanations and remain open to changing their perspective as new information emerges. This approach requires patience, intellectual humility, and a commitment to thoroughness.
A hypothetical case example can illustrate this:
Imagine a detective investigating a murder. Early evidence points towards a known suspect with a history of violence. A case-focused approach might lead the detective to prioritize evidence that incriminates the suspect, potentially overlooking inconsistencies in witness testimonies or alternative suspects.
A truth-focused approach would involve a comprehensive investigation, including:
- Thoroughly examining all witness statements, looking for inconsistencies or hidden motives.
- Collecting and analyzing physical evidence meticulously, considering all possible explanations.
- Investigating potential alternative suspects, regardless of initial suspicions.
- Remaining open to changing their theory if new evidence emerges that contradicts their initial assumptions.
Our Services
- Research Paper Writing
- Essay Writing
- Dissertation Writing
- Thesis Writing
Why Choose Us
- Money Return guarantee
- Guaranteed Privacy
- Written by Professionals
- Paper Written from Scratch
- Timely Deliveries
- Free Amendments