Leadership Skills Application

A Dream Denied?What’s wrong with the team? What’s wrong with the team? Zella Madison’s words repeated over and over in Allen Brooks’s head as he boarded the plane from Los Angeles to Chicago.Brooks was responsible for the technical implementation of the new customer relationship management (CRM) software being installed for western and eastern sales offices in both cities. The software was badly needed to improve follow-up sales for his company, Exerciser Systems, Inc. Exerciser sold exercise equipment to high schools and colleges, as well as to small and midsized businesses for recreation centers, through a national force of 310 salespeople. The company’s low prices won a lot of sales; however, follow-up service was uneven, and the new CRM system promised to resolve those problems with historical data, inquiries, reminders, and updates going to sales reps daily. The CEO of Exerciser ordered the CRM system installed with all possible haste.Brooks pulled a yellow pad and pen from the side pocket of his carry-on bag and tossed it in the seat beside the window, stashed the bag in the overhead compartment, and sat down as other passengers filed past. In an effort to shut out his thoughts, he closed his eyes and concentrated on the muffled voices and low whooshing sound of the air vents. An image appeared in his mind of his promotion to Madison’s job when she retired in two years. He blocked that out and started doodling on the pad as a way of focusing his thoughts.He wrote what’s wrong with the team three times and began drawing arrows to circles bearing the names of his team members: Barry Livingston and Maxine Wojohowski in Los Angeles and Bob Finley, Lynn Johnston, and Sally Phillips in Chicago. He marked through Sally’s name. She had jumped ship recently, taking her less-than-stellar but much-needed talents with her to another company. It was on a previous LA–Chicago flight that Sally had pumped him for feedback on her future with Exerciser. She had informed him that she had another job offer. She admitted it was less money, but she was feeling under pressure as a member of the team and she wanted more “quality of life.” Brooks told Sally bluntly that her technical expertise, on which he placed top importance, was slightly below that of her peers, so future promotion was less likely despite her impressive people and team skills.He wrote “quality of life,” circled it, and then crossed it out and wrote “what the hell?” Why should she get quality of life? he mused. I’ve barely seen my wife and kids since this project started. Brooks’s team was under a great deal of pressure, and he had needed Sally to stick it out. He told her so, but the plane had barely touched down when she went directly to the office and quit, leaving the team short-handed and too close to deadline to add another body.What’s wrong with the team? Brooks furiously scribbled as his thoughts raced: (1) The deadline is ridiculously short. Madison had scheduled a 10-week completion deadline for the new CRM software, including installation and training for both cities.He was interrupted by the flight attendant. “Would you care for a drink, sir?”“Yes. Just water.”Brooks took a sip and continued to write. (2) Thank God for LA. From the outset, Barry and Maxine had worked feverishly while avoiding the whining and complaining that seemed to overwhelm members of the Chicago team. The atmosphere was different. Although the project moved forward, meeting deadlines, there appeared to be less stress. The LA team members focused tirelessly on work, with no families to consider, alternating intense work with joking around. “Those are my kind of people,” he thought. (3) But there is Chicago, he wrote. Earlier in the day Sam Matheny from sales had e-mailed, then called Brooks to tell him the two remaining members of the Chicago team appeared to be alternating between bickering and avoiding one another. Apparently this had been going on for some time. What’s with that? Brooks wondered. And why did Sam know and I didn’t? So that morning, before his flight, Brooks had to make time to call and text both Finley and Johnston. Finley admitted he had overreacted to Johnston.“Look, man. I’m tired and stressed out. We’ve been working non-stop. My wife is not happy.”“Just get along until this project is completed,” Brooks ordered. “When will that be?” Finley asked before hanging up.Brooks thought about Madison’s persistent complaints to him that the team appeared to have a lack of passion, and she admonished him to “get your people to understand the urgency of this project.” Her complaints only added to his own stress level. He had long considered himself the frontrunner for Madison’s job when she retired in two years. But had his team ruined that dream? The sense of urgency could be measured now in the level of stress and the long hours they had all endured. He admitted his team members were unenthusiastic, but they seemed committed.Is it too late to turn around and restore the level of teamwork? He tore off the sheet from the pad, crumpled it in his hand, and stared out the window.Questions

How would you characterize Brooks’s leadership approach (task versus people)? What approach do you think is correct for this situation? Why?
What would you do now if you were Brooks? How might you awaken more enthusiasm in your team for completing this project on time? Specify the steps you would take.
How would you suggest that Brooks modify his leadership style if he wants to succeed Madison in two years?

Full Answer Section

       
  • People-Neglectful: Brooks demonstrates a significant lack of attention to the emotional and interpersonal needs of his team.
    • Evidence:
      • His dismissal of Sally's "quality of life" concerns.
      • His apparent unawareness of the ongoing conflict between Finley and Johnston.
      • His failure to address the team's lack of enthusiasm and high stress levels.
      • His view of the L.A. team as "his kind of people" because they do not complain, and just work.
  • Correct Approach: In this situation, a balanced approach that combines task-oriented and people-oriented leadership is crucial.
    • The project's tight deadline necessitates a focus on task completion.
    • However, the team's high stress levels, interpersonal conflicts, and lack of enthusiasm require a leader who can provide support, foster teamwork, and boost morale.
    • A transformational leadership style would be very helpful.

2. Actions for Brooks Now:

If I were Brooks, I would take the following steps:

  • Immediate Team Meeting (Virtual or In-Person):
    • Acknowledge the team's stress and the challenges they are facing.
    • Facilitate an open and honest discussion about the team's concerns and frustrations.
    • Actively listen to team members' perspectives and validate their feelings.
  • Address Interpersonal Conflicts:
    • Mediate the conflict between Finley and Johnston, encouraging them to communicate respectfully and find common ground.
    • Establish clear guidelines for team communication and conflict resolution.
  • Boost Morale and Enthusiasm:
    • Recognize and appreciate the team's hard work and dedication.
    • Celebrate small victories and milestones to maintain momentum.
    • Provide opportunities for team members to share their ideas and contribute to the project's success.
    • Find out what motivates each team member, and try to provide that motivation.
  • Reassess the Deadline:
    • If possible, negotiate an extension to the deadline or prioritize essential tasks.
    • Communicate with Madison about the team's challenges and the need for realistic expectations.
  • Provide Support and Resources:
    • Ensure the team has the necessary resources and tools to complete their tasks.
    • Offer training or mentorship to address any skill gaps.
    • Encourage team members to take breaks and prioritize self-care.

3. Modifying Brooks's Leadership Style:

To succeed Madison, Brooks needs to significantly modify his leadership style:

  • Develop Emotional Intelligence:
    • Focus on understanding and managing his own emotions and those of others.
    • Practice active listening and empathy.
    • Build strong relationships with team members.
  • Empower and Delegate:
    • Trust his team members and give them autonomy to make decisions.
    • Delegate tasks effectively and provide opportunities for growth.
    • Foster a culture of collaboration and shared responsibility.
  • Improve Communication:
    • Communicate clearly and transparently with his team.
    • Provide regular feedback and recognize achievements.
    • Create a safe space for open and honest communication.
  • Focus on Team Development:
    • Invest in team-building activities and professional development.
    • Foster a positive and supportive team culture.
    • Address conflicts promptly and effectively.
  • Strategic Thinking:
    • He must learn to see the big picture, and not just the tasks in front of him.
    • He must learn to anticipate problems, and to plan for them.
  • Mentorship:
    • Seeking out a mentor, or several mentors, would be very helpful.

Sample Answer

     

Characterizing Brooks's Leadership Approach:

  • Task-Oriented: Allen Brooks's leadership approach heavily leans towards a task-oriented style. He is primarily focused on meeting the project deadline, prioritizing technical implementation, and ensuring the CRM software is installed.
    • Evidence:
      • His focus on the 10-week deadline set by Madison.
      • His frustration with Sally's departure, primarily due to the impact on the project timeline.
      • His directive approach with Bob Finley, ordering him to "just get along."
      • His focus on the technical skill of the team member