For the initial post, pick three (3) of the leading causes of the American Civil War:
The Compromise of 1850
The Fugitive Slave Law 1850
Uncle Tom's Cabin 1852
The Kansas Nebraska Act 1854
The Dred Scott Case of 1857
The Lincoln Douglas Debates 1858
Then, address one (1) of the following for your selections:
-Based on the historical facts given in this module, assess if the American Civil War was inevitable.
-Analyze if the United States Supreme Court can settle legal and moral issues through judiciary review. In your response, provide a documented example of a modern parallel of a legal or moral issue settled by the United States Supreme Court.
Leading Causes of the American Civil War
Leading Causes of the American Civil War
The Compromise of 1850: This legislative package aimed to address the growing tensions between free and slave states by admitting California as a free state and implementing popular sovereignty in other territories. However, it also included provisions such as the Fugitive Slave Law, which intensified the debate over slavery and heightened sectional divisions.
The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850: This law required all citizens to assist in the capture and return of escaped slaves, regardless of their personal beliefs on slavery. It further exacerbated tensions between the North and South, as it compelled Northern states to enforce a practice they found morally objectionable.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852): Harriet Beecher Stowe’s influential novel depicted the harsh realities of slavery, evoking widespread sympathy for enslaved individuals in the North. It increased anti-slavery sentiment, further polarizing the nation along sectional lines.
Assessing the Inevitability of the American Civil War
Based on the historical facts provided, it is plausible to argue that the American Civil War was inevitable. The causes mentioned above highlight underlying tensions and disagreements over slavery, which had been growing since the nation’s inception. The Compromise of 1850 attempted to address these tensions but ultimately fell short, leading to increased division.
The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 added fuel to the fire by forcing Northern states to comply with the capture and return of escaped slaves, even if it conflicted with their own beliefs. This further strained relations between the North and South, contributing to a sense of injustice and resentment.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin played a significant role in shaping public opinion on slavery. It emphasized the moral horrors of slavery and strengthened anti-slavery sentiments in the North. This heightened public awareness and moral outrage further deepened the divide between the two regions.
These factors, along with other events such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Dred Scott Case, and Lincoln-Douglas Debates, continued to escalate tensions and solidify sectionalism. The inability to find a peaceful resolution to the issue of slavery ultimately led to the eruption of armed conflict.
While historical events are complex and multifaceted, it can be argued that given the deep-seated divisions and irreconcilable differences over slavery, a peaceful resolution without armed conflict was highly unlikely. The Civil War can thus be viewed as an eventual outcome of these long-standing conflicts and fundamental disagreements over the institution of slavery in the United States.
United States Supreme Court’s Role in Settling Legal and Moral Issues
The United States Supreme Court has played a crucial role in settling legal and moral issues through judicial review. One documented example of this is the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
This decision was a monumental step towards desegregating schools and challenging the legal foundation of racial discrimination in America. The Court’s ruling was based on legal principles and a recognition of the moral imperative to address racial inequality. By striking down “separate but equal” doctrine established by previous cases such as Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court made significant progress towards achieving racial justice and equality.
Brown v. Board of Education exemplifies how the Supreme Court can use its power of judicial review to settle legal and moral issues. Through its interpretation and application of constitutional principles, the Court can shape public policy, challenge discriminatory practices, and contribute to the evolution of societal norms.
However, it is important to note that while the Supreme Court plays a vital role in settling legal and moral issues, its decisions are not immune to criticism or controversy. Public opinion, political factors, and implementation challenges can influence the impact and acceptance of Supreme Court rulings. Nevertheless, the Court remains a crucial institution for addressing legal and moral issues within the framework of constitutional interpretation.