Pat owns a pharmaceutical company in London, UK. His company manufactures a highly effective abortion pill. He wishes to buy a chemical ingredient from suppliers in the US.Ali agrees, for a fee, to assist Pat in securing a cheap price for the ingredient. Tina agrees to sell to Ali at a huge discount because she is hoping to use Ali's extensive contacts in Europe to make more sales. Tina does not know that Ali is acting for Pat. When she finds out, she refuses to deliver the goods because as president of the Pan American AntiAbortion Alliance group (fictitious) she does not want to be associated with any business that is pro-abortion. Ali has incurred cost in the making the deal that he wants Pat to compensate him for.In a separate transaction, Pat sells to Bibi a large consignment of vaccine on "CIF Singapore, May shipment, "Varinello Vaccine 1000"" terms. Payment is by letter of credit, to be issued by Bank Singa in Singapore. Pat tenders the following documents to Bank Singa:- A bill of lading naming Bibi as consignee and referring to "Vacinelo Vaccine 100" is dated 1 May;- An insurance cover note referring to the goods.Bank Singa suspects that the bill of lading has been falsely dated having received news that the ship had actually set sail on 30 April. Bibi offers to secure a letter of indemnity from a guarantor who will undertake to indemnify the bank from any liability arising from honouring the letter of credit.In a third transaction, Pat sells to Carlo a consignment of abortion pills on "FOB any Southern England port, June shipment" terms. On 25 June, Pat sends the pills to Tilbury because Pat and Carlo had previously used Tilbury as the port of shipment.On 28 June, Carlo tells Pat to send the goods to Southampton because the ship Carlo wishes to nominate is unable to berth at Tilbury. Pat refuses to transport the goods to Southampton, having received a better price for the pills.Assuming that English law applies to all the above transactions, advise the parties as to their rights and liabilities. Please do NOT discuss matters relating to private international law.
No More Worries!
Paper Formatting
- Double or single-spaced
- 1-inch margin
- 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
- 300 words per page
No Lateness!
Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Our Guarantees
- Free Unlimited revisions
- Guaranteed Privacy
- Money Return guarantee
- Plagiarism Free Writing
Legal Analysis of the Transactions Under English Law
Legal Analysis of the Transactions Under English Law
Transaction 1: Chemical Ingredient Purchase
Pat's Position:
- Pat is entitled to compensation from Ali for any costs incurred in securing the deal, as Ali agreed to assist him in obtaining a cheaper price for the chemical ingredient. Pat should seek reimbursement for any expenses reasonably incurred in reliance on Ali's promise.
Ali's Position:
- Ali may have a claim against Tina for breach of contract if she fails to deliver the goods as agreed. However, since Tina was not aware of the ultimate purpose of the transaction, it may complicate the legal position. Ali's recourse would depend on the terms of his agreement with Tina and whether he can enforce specific performance or seek damages for breach.
Tina's Position:
- Tina, as president of the Anti-Abortion Alliance, may refuse to deliver the goods based on her personal beliefs. However, if there was a binding contract in place with Ali, she could face legal consequences for non-performance. The enforceability of the contract may be impacted by Tina's reasons for refusal, as well as any clauses regarding termination or non-fulfillment.
Transaction 2: Vaccine Sale to Bibi
Pat's Position:
- Pat must ensure that all documents submitted to Bank Singa are accurate and in compliance with the terms of the letter of credit. If there are discrepancies or suspicions regarding the bill of lading date, Pat may need to provide clarifications or rectify any errors to avoid non-payment or legal disputes.
Bibi's Position:
- Bibi should cooperate with Bank Singa's investigation into the authenticity of the bill of lading. Offering a letter of indemnity from a guarantor may mitigate risks for the bank but does not absolve Bibi from potential liabilities if there are discrepancies in the documentation provided by Pat.
Transaction 3: Abortion Pills Sale to Carlo
Pat's Position:
- Pat is obligated to fulfill the terms of the contract with Carlo, which specified FOB any Southern England port for shipment in June. Changing the port of shipment without Carlo's consent constitutes a breach of contract. Pat may face legal repercussions if he refuses to transport the goods to Southampton as requested by Carlo.
Carlo's Position:
- Carlo has the right to request a change in the port of shipment within reasonable bounds. If Pat unilaterally decides not to ship the goods to Southampton without valid reasons, Carlo may have grounds to seek damages for breach of contract or specific performance.
In conclusion, adherence to contractual obligations, transparency in transactions, and resolution of disputes through legal channels are essential in ensuring rights and liabilities are properly addressed in each transaction under English law. It is advisable for parties to seek legal counsel to navigate complex commercial transactions and mitigate potential legal risks and liabilities.
Sample Answer
Our Services
- Research Paper Writing
- Essay Writing
- Dissertation Writing
- Thesis Writing
Why Choose Us
- Money Return guarantee
- Guaranteed Privacy
- Written by Professionals
- Paper Written from Scratch
- Timely Deliveries
- Free Amendments