atus of the health-related bill.
25 (25%) - 27 (27%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill.
The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill.
The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill.
The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.
0 (0%) - 24 (24%)
Summary of the legislative intent of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
Identification of the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill are vague and inaccurate or is missing.
Identification of the populations targeted by the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
The description of the current status of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
Advocating for Legislation
Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Based on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement
that addresses the following:
• Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.
• Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.
45 (45%) - 50 (50%)
Testimony clearly and thoroughly provides statements that fully justifies a position for a health-related bill.
Response provides a detailed, thorough, and logical explanation of how to address opponents to the position
for the health-related bill and includes one or more clear and accurate supporting examples.
A complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources is provided. The response fully integrates
at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the responses provided.
40 (40%) - 44 (44%)
Testimony clearly and accurately provides statements that somewhat justifies a position for a health-related bill.
Response provides an accurate explanation of how to address opponents to the position for the health-related
bill and may include at least one supporting example.
An accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource is provided. The response integrates at least 1 outside
resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the responses provided.
35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Testimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague or inaccurate.
12/20/2020 Order 334002759
https://admin.writerbay.com/orders_available?subcom=detailed&id=334002759 4/5
Explanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the health-related bill is vague or inaccurate,
lacks logic, and/or the supporting examples are vague or inaccurate.
A vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources is provided. The response minimally integrates resources
that may support the responses provided.
0 (0%) - 34 (34%)
Testimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing.
Explanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate,
or is missing.
A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources is provided, or is missing. The response fails to
integrate any resources to support the responses provided.
The recommendation of an amendment to the bill in support of the position is inaccurate and incomplete, or is
missing.
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of
ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and
comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all
required criteria.
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Sample Solution