Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Paper Formatting
Double or single-spaced
1-inch margin
12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
300 words per page
No Lateness!
Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Our Guarantees
Free Unlimited revisions
Guaranteed Privacy
Money Return guarantee
Plagiarism Free Writing
Limitations that the U.S. Constitution places upon the power of the government
Do you think that the police should be entitled to search through a citizen's trash for evidence of a crime? If so, why? If not, why not? What limitations do you think the law does or should impose upon the power of the police to use such an investigative practice? In most instances, the government may be entitled to x-ray the contents of your bags at locations such as airports, schools, courts, train depots, and bus terminals. However, suppose for a moment that such x-ray technology had become available to police officers on the street in a hand-held device. Should officers on the street be entitled to x-ray the backpacks, briefcases, purses and other items of citizens on the street? If so, why? If not, why not? What limitations do you think the law does or should impose upon the power of the government (the police) to use such technologies? If you were responsible for drafting the Constitution of a new country what three limitations do you feel would be the most important to place upon the power of the government to investigate and prosecute crimes or in the punishing of offenders?
Sample Answer
This is a fascinating set of questions that touches upon core concepts of Fourth Amendment rights in the United States, specifically the right against unreasonable searches and seizures, and how those concepts translate into fundamental civil liberties.
🗑️ Police Search of Citizen's Trash
Should Police Be Entitled to Search a Citizen's Trash for Evidence of a Crime?
In the United States, based on the Supreme Court's ruling in California v. Greenwood (1988), the answer is yes.
Why (Current Law): The Court held that when you place trash outside your house for collection, you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in the garbage. By placing it in a publicly accessible area, you are essentially abandoning it. Therefore, a police search of trash left at the curb does not constitute a "search" under the Fourth Amendment, and police don't need a warrant or probable cause.
Why Not (Alternative View/Critique): Arguments against this practice center on the idea that the contents of one's trash can reveal incredibly intimate details about a person's life—medical conditions, financial status, reading habits, personal relationships, etc. Many believe that while the trash is physically "abandoned," the expectation of privacy in the contents remains until the refuse is fully commingled with others' waste.
Limitations on Trash Searches
Existing Legal Limitations
Suggested (Should Be) Limitations
Location (The "Curtilage"): The search is limited to trash placed outside the curtilage (the area immediately surrounding the home). Police cannot legally enter a garage or a fenced backyard to retrieve trash without a warrant.
Timing: A reasonable expectation of privacy should apply until the trash is collected by a third party (the waste disposal service) and permanently leaves the custody of the resident.
None (for curbside trash): Once at the curb, virtually no warrant or probable cause is needed, per Greenwood.
Probable Cause: Police should be required to demonstrate probable cause to a judge to get a warrant before sifting through someone's private refuse, regardless of its location at the curb.
📱 Police Use of Hand-Held X-Ray Devices on the Street
Should Officers Be Entitled to X-Ray Citizens' Personal Items on the Street?
The answer should be a definitive no, unless specific, exigent circumstances or established legal doctrines apply.
Why Not: X-raying a backpack or purse on the street would constitute an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment, violating the fundamental right to privacy.
Invasiveness: A hand-held X-ray is a sophisticated technological tool that reveals the contents of an item without physically opening it. This far exceeds the scope of a simple "pat-down" or "stop-and-frisk" search (Terry Stop), which is limited to searching for weapons.
Expectation of Privacy: Citizens maintain a high expectation of privacy in the contents of their personal carrying items (backpacks, purses, etc.) when on the street. X-raying these items, which contain personal and private possessions, would be a major governmental intrusion.
Limitations on X-Ray Technology
Existing Legal Standard Applied
Suggested Limitations
Warrant Requirement: The police must obtain a warrant supported by probable cause before using a sophisticated device to search an item where a high expectation of privacy exists (similar to thermal imaging on a home, per Kyllo v. U.S.).
Exigent Circumstances Only: The use should be limited to true emergencies where the officer has probable cause to believe the item contains an imminent threat to public safety (e.g., a bomb or deadly weapon) and there is no time to get a warrant.
No General Suspicion: It cannot be used indiscriminately based on vague or generalized suspicion.
Exclusionary Rule: Evidence obtained via warrantless X-ray on the street should be strictly excluded from court proceedings to deter illegal searches.
📜 Constitutional Limitations on Government Power
If drafting the Constitution of a new country, the three most important limitations to place upon the government's power in criminal matters would be:
The Right to Due Process and Legal Counsel
Limitation: The government shall not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Furthermore, every person charged with a crime shall be guaranteed the right to legal counsel immediately upon arrest, regardless of their ability to pay.
Rationale: This establishes the bedrock principle of a fair legal system. Without due process, the government can act arbitrarily. Guaranteeing counsel prevents the state from exploiting unrepresented or indigent citizens during investigations and prosecutions.