Mention concrete system being developed using those techniques and give details about them, e.g. who developed them, and details of their, e.g. their functions, specialization areas, the context of their working/testing application, developing history (who develop them and the motivation of development), technical background (which type of techniques used), specific techniques used and implementation details, technical strength and weakness, etc.
(6) When you write the survey, you can write the previous works in terms of temporal order and technology progress order – e.g. A technique/work was developed first to resolve problem X, however, as it does not resolve Y; another technology/work was developed later on to resolve Y, but it does not resolve Z. Therefore a later technology/work was developed to resolve Z, but it does not resolve…. And so on.
If there is not an obvious temporal or progress trend order, you can report on a set of related technologies/works to give a description of what they do, their strength and weakness, and the gaps they do not fill - often these gaps are the gaps that you would like to resolve - if you were to report on your own work in the same paper - you can then go on describing your work in more details in a following sections.
(7) Citing a reference in your survey:
When you refer a paper in your literature review, remember to cite the full info about the paper, including author names, paper title, publication details and page numbers, etc, see an example reference below:
[1] Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A., Toward the Next Generation of
Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible
Extensions, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,