Moral Dilemma: The Whistleblower’s Dilemma

Each person owes a duty to himself or herself and to the world to study ethics and to engage in thoughtful debate about what is right, and what is wrong. It is this habit of thinking about and reflecting on ethics that will help you determine the right choices when faced with an ethical dilemma.
Articulate a moral dilemma wherein one has to show a specific virtue or virtues (it can be any virtue or virtues including honesty, courage, charity/generosity, compassion, etc.)
• What is the moral dilemma about?
• What virtue or virtues should be shown? (You are here selecting the best course of action)
• Why is that virtue or those virtues to be shown?
• How should the virtue or virtues be expressed, and why in that manner?
• Apply Aristotle's golden mean to the dilemma.
• Tell us how the dilemma involves conflict moral duties (loyalty to community versus to self, professional versus familial duties, national or personal obligations).
The dilemma must be a situation in which a choice has to be made.
Be sure you told us why your chosen course of action was best.

  Moral Dilemma: The Whistleblower’s Dilemma The moral dilemma revolves around a situation where an employee discovers that their company is engaged in unethical practices that could harm the public or violate the law. The employee must decide whether to blow the whistle and expose the wrongdoing, potentially risking their job, reputation, and personal well-being, or to remain complicit in the unethical actions. Virtue: Courage and Honesty The virtues of courage and honesty should be shown in this moral dilemma. Courage is necessary to confront the fear of retaliation and potential consequences, while honesty is crucial in upholding ethical values and speaking the truth. Reasoning: Courage: The virtue of courage is essential because it empowers the individual to face the potential negative repercussions of whistleblowing. It requires the strength to overcome fear, stand up for what is right, and protect the interests of the public or stakeholders affected by the unethical actions. Honesty: Honesty is necessary as it aligns with truthfulness and transparency. By revealing the unethical practices, the whistleblower acts with honesty and integrity, upholding ethical values and promoting accountability within the organization. Expression of Virtues: Courage and honesty should be expressed by following these steps: Gathering evidence: The whistleblower should collect substantial evidence to substantiate their claims, ensuring that their accusations are not based on mere assumptions or hearsay. This approach demonstrates both courage and honesty by presenting well-founded concerns. Reporting internally: Initially, the whistleblower should consider reporting their concerns internally, following the proper channels within the organization. This step displays courage, as it requires confronting superiors or colleagues who may be involved in the unethical actions. Honesty is demonstrated by providing accurate information and maintaining transparency throughout the process. External disclosure: If internal reporting fails to address the issue or poses risks to the whistleblower’s safety, they may choose to blow the whistle externally, such as reporting to regulatory authorities or the media. Taking this step requires immense courage as it may expose the whistleblower to significant personal and professional consequences. However, it is an honest act that prioritizes the greater good, exposing the wrongdoing and protecting society from harm. Aristotle’s Golden Mean: Aristotle’s Golden Mean suggests that virtue lies between extremes. In this moral dilemma, it means finding the balance between loyalty to one’s employer and loyalty to ethical principles. The whistleblower should strive to act courageously and honestly without going to extremes such as remaining silent (deficiency) or acting impulsively without proper evidence (excess). Conflict of Moral Duties: The whistleblower’s dilemma involves conflicting moral duties, specifically: Loyalty to the employer vs. loyalty to ethical principles: The whistleblower may feel torn between loyalty to their company and loyalty to doing what is morally right. While loyalty is an important virtue, in this case, loyalty to ethical principles takes precedence as it protects the interests of stakeholders and society at large. Professional duties vs. personal obligations: Whistleblowing may lead to a conflict between professional duties (maintaining confidentiality, promoting a positive corporate image) and personal obligations (upholding moral values, protecting public interest). In such instances, personal obligations towards ethics should take precedence over professional duties. Chosen Course of Action: The best course of action in this moral dilemma is for the employee to gather sufficient evidence, report internally following established protocols, and if necessary, blow the whistle externally. This choice demonstrates a balance between courage and honesty while upholding ethical principles by prioritizing the greater good over personal interests or loyalty to an organization. By following this course of action, the whistleblower acts with integrity, promotes accountability within the organization, and fulfills their responsibility to themselves and society at large.  

Sample Answer