Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Paper Formatting
Double or single-spaced
1-inch margin
12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
300 words per page
No Lateness!
Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Our Guarantees
Free Unlimited revisions
Guaranteed Privacy
Money Return guarantee
Plagiarism Free Writing
Problems in a competitive market environment is deadweight losses.
One of the problems in a competitive market environment is deadweight losses.
What are deadweight losses, and what are their causes?
What are the market effects of a deadweight loss?
What are the major factors that determine who will bear the burden of a tax or the incidence of a tax?
Full Answer Section
Causes of deadweight losses in a competitive market environment include:
Taxes:When a tax is imposed on a good or service, it creates a wedge between the price buyers pay and the price sellers receive. This 1 higher price for buyers leads to a decrease in the quantity demanded, and the lower price for sellers leads to a decrease in the quantity supplied. The result is a lower quantity traded than the efficient equilibrium, leading to a deadweight loss representing the lost gains from trade.
1. brainly.com
Price Controls:
Price Ceilings: A price ceiling set below the equilibrium price prevents the market from reaching its natural equilibrium. This leads to a shortage, as the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied. Some mutually beneficial transactions at prices above the ceiling but below the original equilibrium do not occur, resulting in deadweight loss.
Price Floors: A price floor set above the equilibrium price also prevents the market from clearing. This leads to a surplus, as the quantity supplied exceeds the quantity demanded. Some mutually beneficial transactions at prices below the floor but above the original equilibrium do not occur, leading to deadweight loss.
Quotas: Quantity restrictions, such as import quotas, limit the amount of a good that can be traded. If the quota restricts the quantity below the equilibrium level, it prevents mutually beneficial trades from occurring, resulting in deadweight loss.
Externalities:
Negative Externalities: When the production or consumption of a good imposes a cost on third parties not directly involved in the transaction (e.g., pollution), the market equilibrium quantity is higher than the socially optimal quantity. The overproduction leads to a deadweight loss because the marginal social cost exceeds the marginal social benefit for the units produced beyond the optimal level.
Positive Externalities: When the production or consumption of a good provides a benefit to third parties not directly involved (e.g., vaccination), the market equilibrium quantity is lower than the socially optimal quantity. The underproduction leads to a deadweight loss because the marginal social benefit exceeds the marginal private benefit for the units not produced.
Imperfect Competition (though less directly in a competitive market): While the question focuses on competitive markets, it's worth noting that market power, such as in monopolies or oligopolies, also leads to deadweight losses. These firms often restrict output and charge higher prices than in a perfectly competitive market to maximize profits, resulting in a quantity traded below the socially optimal level.
What are the market effects of a deadweight loss?
The market effects of a deadweight loss are primarily characterized by:
Reduced Total Surplus: The most direct effect is a decrease in the overall economic welfare in the market. The sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus is smaller than it would be in an efficient market without the distortion.
Lost Gains from Trade: Deadweight loss represents the value of the potential transactions that did not happen because of the market distortion. There are buyers who were willing to pay more than the cost of production for additional units, and sellers who were willing to sell at a lower price than some buyers were willing to pay, but these mutually beneficial exchanges did not occur.
Inefficient Allocation of Resources: Deadweight losses signal that resources are not being allocated in the most efficient way possible. The market is not producing the quantity of goods and services that maximizes overall societal well-being.
Potential for Black Markets: In the case of price ceilings set below equilibrium, the shortage created can lead to the emergence of black markets where goods are traded illegally at higher prices, often above what the equilibrium price would have been. This further reduces consumer surplus for those who have to resort to these markets.
Frustration and Dissatisfaction: Price controls can lead to frustration among both buyers and sellers. Buyers may be unable to purchase the quantity they desire at the controlled price, while sellers may be unable to sell as much as they would like at the controlled price.
What are the major factors that determine who will bear the burden of a tax or the incidence of a tax?
The incidence of a tax, or who ultimately bears the economic burden of a tax (which may differ from who is legally required to pay the tax), is primarily determined by the relative price elasticities of demand and supply for the good or service being taxed.
Here's a breakdown of how elasticity influences tax incidence:
Inelastic Demand, Elastic Supply: When demand is relatively inelastic (buyers are not very responsive to price changes) and supply is relatively elastic (sellers are very responsive to price changes), buyers will bear a larger portion of the tax burden. Even with a higher price due to the tax, buyers will still purchase a similar quantity. Sellers, being more sensitive to price changes, will reduce their quantity supplied significantly if they have to absorb a large portion of the tax through lower prices. Therefore, they can pass most of the tax burden onto consumers through higher prices.
Elastic Demand, Inelastic Supply: Conversely, when demand is relatively elastic (buyers are very responsive to price changes) and supply is relatively inelastic (sellers are not very responsive to price changes), sellers will bear a larger portion of the tax burden. If sellers try to raise prices significantly due to the tax, buyers will drastically reduce their purchases. Sellers, with limited ability to change their quantity supplied, will have to absorb most of the tax burden through lower net prices received.
Relatively Equal Elasticities: When the price elasticities of demand and supply are relatively similar, the tax burden will be shared more equally between buyers and sellers.
Perfectly Inelastic Demand: If demand is perfectly inelastic (a vertical demand curve), buyers will bear the entire burden of the tax because the quantity demanded will not change regardless of the price increase.
Perfectly Elastic Demand: If demand is perfectly elastic (a horizontal demand curve), sellers will bear the entire burden of the tax because any increase in price will lead to zero quantity demanded.
Perfectly Inelastic Supply: If supply is perfectly inelastic (a vertical supply curve), sellers will bear the entire burden of the tax because the quantity supplied will not change, and the market price received by sellers will fall by the full amount of the tax.
Perfectly Elastic Supply: If supply is perfectly elastic (a horizontal supply curve), buyers will bear the entire burden of the tax because sellers can supply any quantity at the given price, and the market price paid by buyers will increase by the full amount of the tax.
In summary, the party that is less responsive to price changes (more inelastic) will bear a larger share of the tax burden. This is because they have fewer alternatives and are less likely to alter their behavior in response to the price change caused by the tax.
Sample Answer
Deadweight Losses in a Competitive Market Environment
What are deadweight losses, and what are their causes?
Deadweight loss, also known as welfare loss or allocative inefficiency, refers to the loss of total surplus (the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus) that occurs when the quantity of a good or service traded is below the socially optimal level. It represents the value of the transactions that would have been mutually beneficial but did not occur due to a market distortion. Graphically, it is represented by the triangular area between the supply and demand curves and the quantity traded under the distortion, compared to the efficient equilibrium quantity.