Reflecting on the Transnational Capital Auction: Insights and Implications

What you probably noticed during the Transnational Capital Auction was the "race to the bottom." Various countries underbidding each other can quickly lead to selling out the workers and enabling pollution. The alternative--losing the auction--would mean no jobs for anyone. "Winning" ends up exploiting your own workers. It really seems like a no-win situation. To reflect on the Transnational Capital Auction, please answer the questions below.

FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS

What does it mean to have no environmental laws in a country? What might Capital do?
What would be the social effects of such low wages? How would families be able to survive? How could a family supplement its income?
Consider some of the ideas that are presented as obvious & absolute in the media: Is corporate investment always a good thing? Create a chart listing benefits & harmful effects of investment.
In the game, why did you keep driving down conditions in your country? Why didnt you get together & refuse to bid each other down?
Who benefits & who doesnt benefit from the race to the bottom? How could people in various countries get together to stop attacks on their social & environmental conditions?
What could we do in the U.S. to respond to the global race to the bottom?
Look over your auction bids on minimum wage, worker organizing, taxation rates, & environmental laws. If Capital were to accept your bid & come to your country, what would be the real human & environmental consequences here? Explain in detail.
Based on your experience with the auction, agree &/or disagree with the following statement & back up your answer with evidence: Poor countries need investment, so its a good thing when transnational companies invest there.
The global process that we simulated in class is sometimes called downward leveling or the race to the bottom. What, if anything, could people in poor countries do to stop this race to the bottom?
One company used to manufacture all of its products in the U.S., paying wages that averaged (with benefits) around $16 an hour. The investment director for this company now travels every month to places like Indonesia, El Salvador, & Nicaragua looking for sites to produce his companys products. He says that he would prefer to keep all production in the U.S. Based on this simulation & what you know, why do you think this persons company feels forced to send production to countries that have a lot of Friendly-to-Capital points?
What impact does the face to the bottom have on workers in this country? In what ways might it affect your lives? In answering the question, you might think about the three quotes below:
It is not that foreigners are stealing our jobs, it is that we are all facing one anothers competition. William Baumol, Princeton University economist
Downward leveling is like a cancer that is destroying its host organism the earth & its people. Jeremy Brecher & Tim Costello, Global Village or Global Pillage
Globalization has depressed the wage growth of low-wage workers [in the U.S.]. Its been a reason for the increasing wage gap between high-wage & low-wage workers. Laura Tyson, former Chairperson, U.S. Council of Economic Advisers

  Reflecting on the Transnational Capital Auction: Insights and Implications 1. The Meaning of No Environmental Laws in a Country Having no environmental laws in a country means that there are no regulations to protect natural resources and public health from pollution and over-exploitation. This absence allows capital to operate without restrictions, often leading to: - Increased Pollution: Industries may dump waste into air, water, and land without fear of legal repercussions. - Resource Depletion: Natural resources such as forests, minerals, and water may be exploited unsustainably. - Health Risks: Communities may suffer from health issues due to exposure to toxic substances and environmental degradation. Capital in such environments often seeks to minimize costs, prioritizing profit maximization over ethical considerations or sustainability. 2. Social Effects of Low Wages Low wages can have profound social effects, including: - Poverty: Families struggle to meet basic needs such as food, shelter, and healthcare. - Stress and Mental Health Issues: Financial insecurity can lead to increased stress, anxiety, and mental health problems. To survive on low wages, families might resort to: - Multiple Jobs: Family members may take on multiple jobs to make ends meet. - Informal Work: Engaging in unregulated or informal sector jobs for additional income. - Community Support: Relying on family, friends, or community networks for financial assistance. 3. Corporate Investment: Benefits vs. Harmful Effects Benefits of Investment Harmful Effects of Investment Job creation in local economies Exploitation of workers due to low wages Infrastructure development Environmental degradation and pollution Transfer of technology and skills Erosion of local cultures and traditions Increased access to goods and services Dependence on foreign companies Economic growth potential Inequality and wealth disparity 4. Driving Down Conditions in the Auction In the auction, countries often drove down conditions due to fear of losing potential jobs and investments. The competitive nature of the auction created an environment where: - Survival Instincts Prevail: Countries felt compelled to offer lower wages and poorer working conditions to attract capital. - Lack of Solidarity: Without collective action or unity among countries, it was challenging to resist the downward trend. 5. Beneficiaries and Victims of the Race to the Bottom Who Benefits: - Transnational Corporations: They gain access to cheaper labor and reduced operational costs. - Consumers in Wealthy Nations: They benefit from lower prices for goods and services. Who Doesn't Benefit: - Local Workers: They face job insecurity, low wages, and poor working conditions. - The Environment: Natural resources are often over-exploited, leading to ecological damage. Stopping Attacks on Social & Environmental Conditions People in various countries can unite through: - International Labor Movements: Collaborating across borders to advocate for fair labor practices. - Consumer Awareness Campaigns: Encouraging consumers to support ethically produced goods. - Policy Advocacy: Lobbying for international regulations that protect workers and the environment. 6. U.S. Responses to the Global Race to the Bottom In response to the global race to the bottom, the U.S. could: - Implement Fair Trade Policies: Encourage trade agreements that protect labor rights and environmental standards. - Support Local Manufacturing: Advocate for policies that incentivize domestic production and fair wages. - Enhance Worker Protections: Strengthen labor laws that protect workers from exploitation both domestically and globally. 7. Consequences of Accepting Bids from Capital If Capital were to accept bids for lower minimum wage, worker organizing restrictions, lower taxation rates, and relaxed environmental laws, the consequences could include: - Worker Exploitation: Increased hours with minimal pay leading to poorer living standards. - Environmental Degradation: Rapid industrialization without oversight could lead to pollution, loss of biodiversity, and health crises. - Social Unrest: Growing inequality could lead to protests and social instability as workers demand better conditions. 8. Investment in Poor Countries: A Double-Edged Sword Agreeing with the statement that "poor countries need investment" requires nuance. While investment can lead to job creation and economic growth, it often comes at a significant cost. Evidence from the simulation highlights how investments can exploit workers and harm the environment. Ultimately, investment should be pursued with protections for labor rights and environmental standards in place. 9. Stopping the Race to the Bottom in Poor Countries To combat the race to the bottom, people in poor countries could: - Organize Labor Unions: Strengthening labor movements would empower workers to demand fair wages and conditions. - Engage in International Solidarity: Form alliances with workers in other countries facing similar challenges. - Promote Sustainable Practices: Advocate for responsible investment that prioritizes social and environmental well-being over mere profit. 10. Corporate Pressure to Move Production Abroad Companies often feel compelled to move production overseas for various reasons: - Cost Reduction: Seeking lower wages and lax regulations increases profit margins. - Market Access: Production in regions with growing markets can enhance competitiveness. Despite a preference for domestic production, economic pressures force companies into decisions that prioritize profits over ethical considerations. 11. Impact on U.S. Workers The race to the bottom affects U.S. workers by: - Job Insecurity: Global competition leads to offshoring jobs and stagnation of wage growth. - Wage Depression: An influx of cheap labor from abroad contributes to wage stagnation or decline for low-wage workers. Reflecting on Quotes: 1. William Baumol's Insight: The competition among global labor forces creates challenges for all workers as they compete for jobs. 2. Jeremy Brecher & Tim Costello's Warning: Downward leveling erodes not just local conditions but threatens global sustainability. 3. Laura Tyson's Observation: Globalization's impact on wage growth exacerbates inequality within the U.S., leaving low-wage workers increasingly vulnerable. In conclusion, while globalization presents opportunities for investment and growth, it also poses significant challenges that require careful consideration of labor rights and environmental protections. By fostering solidarity among workers globally, advocating for fair practices, and implementing protective policies, we can work towards a more equitable global economy that prioritizes people over profits.  

Sample Answer