Rhetorical Analysis of “Who Will Own the Art of the Future?”

  Rhetorical Analysis of “Who Will Own the Art of the Future?” The article titled “Who Will Own the Art of the Future?” published on Wired.com explores the potential implications of OpenAI’s DALL·E, an AI model capable of generating highly realistic images from textual descriptions. Written by the author, the article applies various rhetorical strategies to present a thought-provoking analysis of the copyright and intellectual property issues that arise with the emergence of AI-generated art. The author employs ethos to establish credibility and expertise on the subject matter. By referencing prominent figures such as OpenAI and artists who have experimented with AI-generated art, the author positions themselves as knowledgeable about the topic. This lends weight to their arguments and enhances their persuasive appeal. Throughout the article, the author utilizes logos to present logical arguments supported by evidence. They discuss how DALL·E can create original images using textual prompts and highlight its potential to revolutionize the art industry. The author cites specific examples, such as computer-generated paintings that have already sold for significant amounts. This evidence-based approach strengthens the article’s credibility and encourages readers to consider the implications of AI-generated art. Pathos is employed effectively in the article to evoke an emotional response from readers. The author emphasizes the transformative power of AI and its potential impact on human creativity and artistic expression. By raising questions about the future ownership and control of AI-generated art, the author taps into readers’ concerns about the preservation of human ingenuity and authenticity. This emotional appeal helps to engage readers on a deeper level and encourages them to reflect on the potential consequences. The article also utilizes rhetorical devices such as rhetorical questions and vivid imagery to captivate readers’ attention. By posing questions like “Who will own AI-generated art?”, the author invites readers to consider the ethical and legal implications of this emerging technology. The use of vivid language, such as describing AI-generated paintings as “captivating” and “intriguing,” creates a sense of wonder and fascination, further drawing readers into the discussion. Additionally, the article demonstrates effective organization through clear section headings that guide readers through different aspects of the topic. Each section focuses on a specific aspect, such as the uniqueness of AI-generated art or copyright considerations, allowing readers to follow the author’s train of thought easily. This logical structure enhances the clarity and coherence of the article. In conclusion, “Who Will Own the Art of the Future?” successfully employs rhetorical strategies to explore the copyright and intellectual property implications of AI-generated art. Through appeals to ethos, logos, and pathos, the author engages readers in a thought-provoking discussion about the challenges and opportunities presented by this emerging technology. By utilizing rhetorical devices and maintaining a clear organizational structure, the article effectively communicates its message while capturing readers’ attention and stimulating further reflection on the future of art ownership. References: “Who Will Own the Art of the Future?” (2021). Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/openai-dalle-copyright-intellectual-property-art/      

Sample Answer