Schematic Teaching: A Critique of Idealism and Realism in Education

In support of schematic teaching render a fully-fledged critique of idealism and realism. While conducting this task you are expected to refer to Gerald L Gutek (2013) in order to give theoretical perspectives and link them to education.
NOTA BENE*
1. All assignments should be typed (in TIMES NEW ROAM, FONT 12, 1 SPACING)2. All assignments should be submitted before the deadline time on a due date3. All assignments should have both in-text and bibliography reference of not less than 6 from different sources4. The surname and the student number should be clearly and un-mistakenly written5. No person should plagiarize (it’s an academic crime to do so and it is punishable)6. Only formal language should be used (no elisions, cryptic words, or insults)7. All assignments should be written in an academic essay format (no tables, graphs, pictures etc)8. The word count of the assignment essay is between 1500 – 2000 words

    Schematic Teaching: A Critique of Idealism and Realism in Education Introduction In the realm of education, two philosophical ideologies, idealism and realism, have long been debated for their effectiveness in shaping teaching and learning practices. Gerald L. Gutek (2013) provides valuable insights into these theoretical perspectives and their implications for education. This essay aims to critique both idealism and realism, supporting the notion that schematic teaching offers a more comprehensive and student-centered approach to education. Idealism in Education Idealism posits that reality is fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature, emphasizing the importance of ideas and values. In education, idealism suggests that the purpose of schooling is to cultivate intellectual and moral virtues in students. Proponents of idealism argue that education should focus on the development of the mind and character, emphasizing abstract and moral. ,ism faced for tendency prioritize knowledge practical. argue ideal approaches fail adequately students real challenges practical.,ism emphasis universal andutes limit' to critically engage diverse. ##ism EducationOn other, asserts reality independent human, the of evidence observable. education realism for curriculum is in physical and experiences Real educators hands learning experial to students practical. realism a tangible experial to, argue it neglect importance values ethics and thinking Real approaches focus heavily ro memor and knowledge potentiallyling' and thinking. ##chematic: Balanced contrast the dich ofism realism schematic offers balanced flexible approach to.chematic integrates of ideal and, the of development practical, thinking and reasoningBy diverse strategies methodologies schematic accommod the learning and of. approach educators adapt teaching based students strengths interests and, a inclusive engaging environment--- Conclusion In, ideal and have merits limitations schematic emerges a holistic student approach education By on theoretical of L Gk201) integrating ofism realism educators create learning that students think, problems, engagefully the around.chematic represents promising forward shaping future education--- this, have examinedism realism education highlighting strengths weaknesses Through lens schematic, have a balanced inclusive thatizes-centered learning and development Gerald.ute's perspectives provided insights the of philosophy guiding towards more understanding effective practices.

Sample Answer