The Association of Status with Justice: Perspectives of Plato and Aristotle

  Title: The Association of Status with Justice: Perspectives of Plato and Aristotle Introduction: The concept of justice has long been a subject of philosophical inquiry, with Plato and Aristotle, two prominent ancient Greek philosophers, offering distinct perspectives on the association between status and justice. In this essay, we will explore how Plato and Aristotle viewed the relationship between social status and justice, shedding light on their contrasting ideas and underlying principles. Thesis Statement: Plato associated justice with a harmonious society where each individual fulfills their designated role, while Aristotle believed in distributive justice that ensures fair distribution of resources based on merit rather than social status. Body: I. Plato’s View: Idealized Society: Plato’s Republic presents a just society as one in which individuals are assigned specific roles based on their innate abilities and talents. Each individual has a predetermined place in society: rulers (philosopher-kings), guardians (warriors), and producers (artisans, farmers). Justice is achieved when individuals adhere to their designated roles, promoting harmony and social order. The Three Parts of the Soul: Plato draws an analogy between the just society and the individual soul. The soul consists of three parts: reason (rational), spirit (emotional), and appetites (desires). Justice occurs when reason dominates the other parts of the soul, maintaining a harmonious balance. Associating Status with Justice: Plato believed that justice is present when each individual performs their assigned role without encroaching upon the roles of others. The status of individuals in society is determined by their inherent qualities and abilities, aligning with Plato’s concept of justice. II. Aristotle’s View: Distributive Justice: Aristotle’s concept of justice focuses on distributive justice, which ensures a fair distribution of resources, honors, and benefits within society. Justice is not solely based on social status but rather on merit, virtue, and contribution to the community. Virtuous Mean: Aristotle emphasized the importance of virtue in achieving justice. Justice lies in finding the mean between extremes: deficiency and excess. Virtuous actions result from cultivating moral virtues through habituation. Associating Merit with Justice: For Aristotle, justice involves recognizing individual merit and granting rewards or benefits accordingly. Social status should not determine one’s entitlement to justice; instead, it should be based on an individual’s contribution to society and their moral character. Conclusion: In conclusion, Plato and Aristotle provide distinct perspectives on the association between status and justice. Plato associates justice with a harmonious society where individuals fulfill their designated roles based on inherent qualities, while Aristotle emphasizes distributive justice based on merit rather than social status. By understanding these contrasting viewpoints, we gain insights into the ideas of justice put forth by these ancient Greek philosophers. Both perspectives contribute to our understanding of justice and guide us in striving for a more equitable society where fairness is upheld and each individual is recognized for their contributions.

Sample Answer