The Complex Character of the Lawyer in "Bartleby the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street"

Focus on “Bartleby the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street,” by Herman Melville, as your primary text (no external sources are required). In doing so you must make a case in answer to the following questions: is the lawyer, our narrator, a “good” or virtuous person, or is he a merely a law-abiding citizen? And is there a difference? Is his story largely self-serving (told to minimize or obscure his own complicity and guilt)? Or does he rightly seem to feel some sense of guilt and responsibility for Bartleby’s death? The answers to these questions are not necessarily clear-cut, but require parsing the lawyer’s words and deeds in the context of the narrative itself.

  The Complex Character of the Lawyer in "Bartleby the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street" Herman Melville's "Bartleby the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street" presents readers with a complex narrator, the lawyer, who provokes questions about his moral character and sense of responsibility. Through a careful examination of the lawyer's words and deeds, it becomes apparent that he is more than just a law-abiding citizen. While he may not fit the conventional definition of a "good" person, he displays certain virtues and wrestles with guilt and complicity in Bartleby's tragic fate. This essay will explore the lawyer's character, analyzing the nuances of his actions and motivations within the context of the narrative. The lawyer in "Bartleby the Scrivener" can be seen as a law-abiding citizen, as he adheres to societal norms and fulfills his professional duties. However, his character goes beyond mere compliance with the law. He demonstrates qualities that can be associated with virtue, such as compassion and empathy. For instance, when Bartleby refuses to work or leave the office, the lawyer initially tries to understand him and accommodate his peculiarities. He allows Bartleby to remain in the office and even offers him assistance. This display of empathy shows that the lawyer possesses a genuine concern for Bartleby's well-being, which goes beyond his legal obligations as an employer. Nevertheless, the lawyer's narrative can be interpreted as self-serving in certain aspects. He presents himself as a reasonable and patient employer, highlighting his efforts to accommodate Bartleby's unconventional behavior. However, his portrayal may serve to minimize his own complicity and guilt in the tragic events that unfold. By emphasizing his attempts at understanding and assisting Bartleby, the lawyer may seek to shift responsibility away from himself. This self-serving aspect of his storytelling raises doubts about his true intentions. Despite any self-serving tendencies, it is evident that the lawyer feels a sense of guilt and responsibility for Bartleby's death. Towards the end of the story, the lawyer expresses remorse and reflects on his role in Bartleby's decline. He ponders whether he could have done more to help Bartleby and acknowledges his own shortcomings. This introspection and acknowledgment of guilt demonstrate the lawyer's genuine remorse and suggest that he does not absolve himself entirely from blame. The complexity of the lawyer's character lies in this tension between self-interest and guilt. He may tell his story in a way that obscures his complicity, but he also shows genuine remorse for his actions or lack thereof. This portrayal highlights the moral ambiguity inherent in human nature, where individuals can simultaneously exhibit virtues and harbor selfish motives. In conclusion, the lawyer in "Bartleby the Scrivener" is more than just a law-abiding citizen. While his actions may be guided by self-interest at times, he does display virtues such as empathy and compassion towards Bartleby. The self-serving nature of his narrative cannot be dismissed, but it is also clear that he feels a sense of guilt and responsibility for Bartleby's tragic fate. The complexity of his character invites readers to reflect on the complexities of morality and human behavior, reminding us that individuals are not easily classified as purely good or bad.  

Sample Answer