The difference between following the crowd and making decisions based on personal beliefs

Full Answer Section

Following the Crowd vs. Personal Beliefs

The distinction between following the crowd and making decisions based on personal beliefs is a complex one. While it's often easier to conform to the group, making decisions based on personal beliefs can lead to more authentic and fulfilling outcomes.

Real-Life Examples:

1. Following the Crowd: When choosing a college to attend, I initially considered the most popular and prestigious options. However, after careful consideration and reflection on my personal goals, I decided to pursue a smaller, less traditional college that better aligned with my values and interests.
2. Sticking to Personal Beliefs: During a group project, I disagreed with the majority's approach to solving a problem. Despite the pressure to conform, I persisted in advocating for my own solution, which ultimately proved to be the most effective.

Asch's Study:

Asch's study was primarily looking at normative influence. This type of conformity occurs when people change their behavior to fit in with the group, even if they disagree with the majority. The video presented several findings that support this conclusion:

1. Line Judgment Task: Participants in Asch's study often conformed to the majority's incorrect answer, even when the correct answer was obvious. This suggests that people are more likely to conform to group norms, even when it goes against their own judgment.
2. Dissenter Effect: When there was a dissenter in the group, participants were more likely to resist conforming to the majority. This indicates that the presence of a dissenting opinion can reduce conformity.

Group Size and Imitation:

In the video on group size and imitation, it was found that the number of people who conform increases as the group size grows. This phenomenon is known as social proof. When people are uncertain about how to behave, they often look to others for cues. As the group size increases, the perceived consensus becomes stronger, making it more likely that individuals will conform.

Convincing a Jury

If I were serving on a jury trial and found myself the only person who believed the defendant was innocent, I would use the following strategies to convince the majority:

• Present Evidence: Gather and present all the evidence that supports the defendant's innocence.
• Question the Prosecution's Case: Identify weaknesses in the prosecution's case and challenge their assumptions.
• Appeal to Logic and Reason: Use logical arguments and evidence to persuade the jury of the defendant's innocence.
• Seek Support: Try to find common ground with other jurors and build alliances.
• Be Persistent: Remain persistent and continue to advocate for the defendant's innocence, even if it seems like a losing battle.

Sample Answer