The Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia: A Consideration of Physician-Assisted Suicide

  Title: The Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia: A Consideration of Physician-Assisted Suicide Introduction Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are two controversial and emotionally charged topics that revolve around the ethics of end-of-life decisions. While both involve the act of intentionally ending a person's life to relieve suffering, there exists a fundamental distinction between the two. Euthanasia refers to the act of directly administering a lethal dose of medication to a patient, with their explicit consent, in order to end their life. On the other hand, physician-assisted suicide involves providing the patient with the means to end their own life, typically through the prescription of lethal medication, which the patient ingests themselves. Thesis Statement This essay argues against the practice of physician-assisted suicide due to the potential risks it poses to vulnerable individuals, the slippery slope it may create, and the importance of upholding the sanctity of life and preservation of ethical medical practices. Arguments Against Physician-Assisted Suicide Vulnerability and Safeguarding: One of the main concerns surrounding physician-assisted suicide is the potential for abuse and coercion, particularly towards vulnerable individuals such as those with disabilities or mental illnesses. Legalizing physician-assisted suicide may put pressure on patients who feel like a burden on their families or society to choose death over life. This places an immense responsibility on healthcare professionals to ensure that patients are not influenced by external factors and are capable of making autonomous decisions regarding their own lives. Slippery Slope: Another argument against physician-assisted suicide is the concern of a slippery slope effect. Once society accepts the principle that it is acceptable to intentionally end a person's life under certain circumstances, there may be a gradual expansion of those circumstances. This could eventually lead to a situation where society devalues human life and opens the door to non-voluntary euthanasia or even involuntary euthanasia. Maintaining a clear boundary between preserving life and intentionally ending it is crucial to prevent any potential abuse or misuse. Preserving Ethical Medical Practices: The practice of medicine is built upon the principles of healing, alleviating suffering, and promoting well-being. Intentionally causing death conflicts with these core principles. Physicians take an oath to "do no harm," and assisting in ending life contradicts this principle. By focusing on improving palliative care and end-of-life support, healthcare professionals can provide comfort and dignity to patients without resorting to physician-assisted suicide. Conclusion While compassion for those who suffer is paramount, legalizing physician-assisted suicide raises serious ethical concerns. The potential for abuse, the slippery slope effect, and the violation of fundamental medical principles all argue against its legalization. Instead, society should prioritize investing in comprehensive palliative care services, improved pain management, and psychological support for patients facing end-of-life challenges. By doing so, we can enhance the quality of life for individuals while upholding ethical standards in the medical profession.

Sample Answer