The Impact of Materialism on Environmental Sustainability: A Christian Perspective

Write a 3–4-page documented essay where you identify and evaluate a
presupposition or set of presuppositions in your discipline in light of the worldview of Christian
theism. To accomplish this purpose, complete the following tasks:
 Identify specific beliefs or ideas (presuppositions) in your discipline or field (career) in
general. *Not topics.
 Choose one presupposition or a set of presuppositions to examine in detail.
 Identify the worldview that the presupposition represents.
 Examine its validity in light of Christian theism.
Essay Assignment:
 View: How to Write a Documented Discipline Worldview Essay,
http://www.kaltura.com/tiny/iz1k7
 Read: Albert Wolters, from Creation Regained, pages 133-140 (Encounters)
 Read: Glenn Tinder, "Can We Be Good Without God?" pages 147-150 (Encounters)
 Read: C. S. Lewis, “The Poison of Subjectivism” pages 163-171 (Encounters)
 Read: C. S. Lewis, "The Weight of Glory," pages 487-490 (Encounters)
 Read: “World Views” by Jerry Solomon, http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/wviews.html
 Read: “Five Worldviews by Dennis McCallum, https://www.xenos.org/essays/fiveworldviews
 Organize your essay by dividing it into three parts:

  1. In your discipline (your field [career] or major), examine a specific worldview and its
    underlying presuppositions. You may select more than one. Remember to refer to a
    worker in the discipline using the third person (doctor, teacher, accountant, etc.).
    Choose a worldview that is antithetical (or at least is not accommodating) to
    Christianity; a worldview with which you disagree.
    o Start with a solid three sub-point thesis.
     Example: In the field of education, people presuppose that anyone can
    teach, that teachers are just babysitters, and that teachers should not be
    paid very much. Then you would prove the biblical worldview that
    teaching is a specific gift from the Holy Spirit.
     Example: In the field of pastoral leadership, people presuppose that
    pastors work one day a week, that pastors are in it for the money, and
    that pastors really do not believe what they preach.
    o Your presuppositions can be determined by asking the following questions:
     What do the presuppositions say about meaning?
     How is evidence approached and evaluated?
     Should the presuppositions and the subsequent theory or assertion be
    rejected by the Christian theist?
     Should the belief or theory be accepted by the Christian theist at all? If
    so, in what manner?
     Can the theory or position be modified to fit a Christian theistic
    worldview?
  2. Show how and why the worldview is flawed.
    o Use the tests of reason, experience, and practice to analyze the
    presuppositions of the worldview.
    o Use presuppositional apologetics as a means to evaluate how a particular
    worldview stands on its own merits. In other words, examine the validity of
    the basic assertions of an argument.
    o Discuss the ramifications for the discipline if the worldview is carried to its
    logical conclusion.
  3. Assert the correct worldview as it relates to Christian theism.
    o Indicate the reasons this worldview and its presuppositions are valid.
    o Discuss the ramifications of this worldview in the discipline you have chosen.
    o Explain how the Christian perspective would direct the theories or ideas
    espoused as well as guide the activities of the researcher or scientist. How
    would the field change?
    o In what ways could your faith in Christ enrich your discipline?
    o How could Christianity ensure the validity and correctness of the actions
    taken as a result of the discoveries of the discipline.
    Essay Format:
    Paragraph 1 (Introduction).
     Your first paragraph should introduce your field and contain a clear, well-focused thesis
    statement which presents your position on the subject chosen. You are not trying to make
    the reader guess your position. It needs to be clear from the first paragraph. This
    paragraph should consist of five to seven sentences. Again, start with presuppositions
    which you disagree with (antithetical).
    Paragraph 2.
     In Paragraph 2 you need to reference at least two of the readings (from Encounters) listed
    above. These are general readings that discuss some aspect of worldview or provide
    answers to worldview questions. Here you will design the foundation for the rest of your
    paper.
     In paragraph 2, you will also set the stage for contextualizing the specific topic you will
    choose. Although you do not have to examine all of the areas below, here are some
    questions to consider.
    a) Metaphysical questions—What is reality? What is the nature of God? What is the
    role of the supernatural realm? Is there an afterlife? Who determines what is real?
    What is a human being?
    b) Epistemological questions—How is knowledge acquired? What is known? What
    is the source of knowledge? What is reason/ logic? What is the role of
    experience? What is certain? What is the purpose of evil? What is the nature of
    man?
    c) Axiological questions—What/Who determines value? What is beauty? What is
    good/right (ethics)? What is truth? What is the value of history?
    Paragraphs 3-4.
     In these two paragraphs you are presenting the arguments against the position you have
    chosen. To accomplish this, you will research the worldview or presuppositions in your
    discipline. Consider the prominent thinkers/theorists that have influenced your field.
    Then find sources that indicate the foundational ideas of your discipline and/or the
    influential figures. After reviewing the reading assignments above, identify which
    worldview, ideology, or philosophy your discipline’s worldview or presupposition most
    closely resembles.
     You are also required to find at least two or three articles related to your field that help
    you make this integration. Any sources outside the Encounters textbook must be
    academic sources or peer-reviewed sources. Googled websites from the Internet are not
    necessarily credible, authoritative, or trustworthy. Questionable sources will not be
    accepted. If you doubt whether your source might be questionable, please check with
    your professor. Also read LBH 43.2 for some excellent discussion on “Evaluating
    Sources.”
    Paragraphs 5-6.
     In these two paragraphs you will argue your position clearly and coherently. Include how
    your position reflects a Christian worldview. It is important to remember that you do not
    have to be completely against something in order for it to be Christian. You can take a
    view that takes the opposition and reshapes it, or you can accommodate it in light of
    Christian theism. If you choose to use Scripture, you must use it as a support. This is not
    a sermon, so do not preach.
    Paragraph 7 (Conclusion).
     In this final paragraph you will drive your point home demonstrating without redundancy
    why your argument is logical, believable, and correct.
  The Impact of Materialism on Environmental Sustainability: A Christian Perspective Introduction In the field of environmental science, one of the prevailing presuppositions is the materialistic worldview that places a high value on consumerism, economic growth, and exploitation of natural resources for human benefit. This essay aims to evaluate the implications of materialism on environmental sustainability in light of Christian theism. By examining the flaws of a materialistic worldview and asserting the correct worldview as it relates to Christian theism, we can gain insights into how our faith can enrich the field of environmental science. Setting the Foundation To lay the groundwork for this discussion, it is crucial to delve into metaphysical, epistemological, and axiological questions that underpin the materialistic worldview prevalent in environmental science. The materialistic perspective asserts that reality is solely physical, devoid of any transcendent dimension. Knowledge is acquired through empirical observation and scientific inquiry, with an emphasis on quantifiable data. Values are often determined by economic considerations, with profit and efficiency outweighing ethical or ecological concerns. Unpacking the Flaws of Materialism in Environmental Science The materialistic worldview in environmental science leads to a number of detrimental consequences. Firstly, when nature is viewed purely as a resource to be exploited for human gain, it fosters a mindset of domination rather than stewardship. This results in deforestation, pollution, and habitat destruction, threatening biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Secondly, the relentless pursuit of economic growth at the expense of environmental conservation perpetuates a cycle of resource depletion and ecological degradation. Finally, the narrow focus on short-term gains neglects the long-term consequences of environmental degradation, jeopardizing the well-being of future generations. Advocating for a Christian Perspective In contrast to materialism, Christian theism offers a holistic worldview that emphasizes stewardship, interconnectedness, and reverence for creation. The biblical narrative portrays humanity as caretakers entrusted with the responsibility to nurture and preserve the Earth. By recognizing the intrinsic value of all living beings and ecosystems, Christians are called to promote sustainability, justice, and compassion towards both people and the planet. The Christian perspective enriches environmental science by providing a moral compass that guides ethical decision-making and policy formulation. By integrating principles of creation care, conservation biology, and eco-theology into research and practice, environmental scientists can work towards solutions that prioritize ecological integrity, social equity, and spiritual well-being. The Christian worldview challenges the reductionist mindset of materialism and invites us to embrace a more holistic view of nature that reflects God's wisdom and love for all creation. Conclusion In conclusion, the materialistic presuppositions in environmental science pose significant challenges to sustainability and ecological well-being. By critically examining these flaws through the lens of Christian theism, we can cultivate a deeper understanding of our role as stewards of creation and advocates for environmental justice. Embracing a worldview that values interconnectedness, sustainability, and reverence for life offers a transformative vision for environmental science that aligns with our moral responsibility to care for God's creation. Through integrating faith with reason, we can forge a path towards a more sustainable and harmonious relationship with the natural world.

Sample Answer