While bureaucrats have an awful lot of power, they do have some accountability to the public. For example, most of the rules bureaucrats propose must be open for public comment. These proposed rules are posted on The Federal Register,(https://www.federalregister.gov/) and are there for anyone to review and comment on, typically for 60 days.
Your task is to go to The Federal Register and review a proposed rule under the Current Issue section. To receive credit, you'll need to:
Summarize the rule-- who proposed it, and what will it change?
Analyze the rule-- give at least one reason why the new rule would be good, and one reason why it would be bad
Evaluate the rule-- Should the rule be passed? Why, or why not? (0-4 points)
Be sure your essay is at least 250 words long, and includes a link to the proposed rule. No credit will be awarded if you fail to do this. Also-- keep in mind that, while this is a shorter essay, you are still expected to use multiple paragraphs in your essay. No credit will be awarded if your essay is only one paragraph long.
The Proposed Rule on Electronic Logging Devices for Commercial Motor Vehicles
The Proposed Rule on Electronic Logging Devices for Commercial Motor Vehicles
The proposed rule that I have chosen to review from The Federal Register is the “Electronic Logging Devices and Hours of Service Supporting Documents” proposed by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). This rule aims to mandate the use of electronic logging devices (ELDs) in commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) to improve compliance with hours of service (HOS) regulations. The proposed rule can be found here https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/06/17/2021-11329/electronic-logging-devices-and-hours-of-service-supporting-documents.
The FMCSA, a division of the Department of Transportation, has proposed this rule to enhance road safety by requiring CMVs to use ELDs instead of paper logs to record drivers’ HOS. The ELDs would automatically record driving time, engine hours, vehicle movement, and location information, thereby reducing the risk of inaccurate or falsified records. This proposal would replace the previous requirement for CMVs to use automatic onboard recording devices (AOBRDs), which are older technology lacking some of the advanced features provided by ELDs.
One potential benefit of this new rule is increased accuracy and reliability in monitoring drivers’ HOS. ELDs would provide real-time tracking of drivers’ hours, ensuring that they comply with federal regulations aimed at preventing driver fatigue and promoting road safety. This would help mitigate the risks associated with drowsy driving and reduce the number of accidents caused by exhausted commercial drivers.
However, there are also potential drawbacks to consider. Some opponents argue that mandating ELD usage may be burdensome for small carriers and independent owner-operators who may struggle with the cost and implementation of this technology. Additionally, concerns have been raised regarding potential privacy issues related to the constant tracking and monitoring of drivers’ movements and location information.
In my evaluation, I believe that the proposed rule should be passed, despite the concerns raised. The implementation of ELDs has already shown promising results in improving compliance with HOS regulations and reducing the number of accidents caused by fatigued drivers. While there may be initial challenges for small carriers and owner-operators, the long-term benefits of enhanced road safety outweigh these concerns. However, it is essential for the FMCSA to address the privacy concerns and ensure proper safeguards are in place to protect drivers’ personal information.
In conclusion, the proposed rule on electronic logging devices for commercial motor vehicles is a crucial step towards improving road safety and ensuring compliance with hours of service regulations. By mandating the use of ELDs, the FMCSA aims to reduce accidents caused by driver fatigue and enhance the accuracy of HOS records. While there are potential challenges and privacy concerns associated with this rule, the overall benefits justify its passing. It is important for stakeholders to collaborate and address any implementation difficulties while ensuring the protection of drivers’ privacy rights.