The Prosecution’s Case: Charged Crimes and the Question of Attempt

Title: The Prosecution’s Case: Charged Crimes and the Question of Attempt Introduction: In the case of Michelle and Cheryl, who conspired to rob Capital One Bank, it is essential to determine the crimes they can be charged with. Moreover, we must analyze whether their actions constitute the crime of attempt. To establish a well-supported argument, this essay will explore the potential charges against Michelle and Cheryl and delve into the legal reasoning behind them. I. Conspiracy: Michelle and Cheryl engaged in an agreement to commit a crime, namely robbing Capital One Bank. This act constitutes the crime of conspiracy, where two or more individuals plan to commit an offense together. Despite not having executed the robbery itself, the agreement itself is sufficient for a conspiracy charge. II. Attempted Robbery: A. Michelle:

1. Intent: Michelle’s intention to rob the bank is evident from her desperate financial situation and her involvement in planning the crime. Her actions demonstrate a clear desire to obtain money unlawfully.
2. Substantial Step: Michelle’s participation in planning, making arrangements, and going to the nail salon, where they were arrested, can be deemed “substantial steps.” These steps indicate her intent to commit the robbery and bring her closer to its completion.

B. Cheryl:

1. Intent: Cheryl’s intention to commit the robbery can be inferred from her purchase of a gun and ski mask, as well as discussing her plan with the bartender at the local pub.
2. Substantial Step: Cheryl’s purchase of the necessary items for the robbery, combined with her discussion about it with the bartender, indicates her intent to actively participate in the crime.

Based on the above analysis, both Michelle and Cheryl can be charged with attempted robbery. Their actions demonstrate a shared intent, substantial steps towards committing the crime, and an agreement between them. III. The Crime of Attempt: To establish whether Michelle and Cheryl’s actions constitute the crime of attempt, we must consider the legal elements required for a conviction. In general, an attempt occurs when an individual takes a substantial step towards the completion of a crime, with the specific intent to commit said offense. A. Intent: Both Michelle and Cheryl exhibited a clear intent to commit the robbery. Their discussions, planning, and purchases demonstrate their shared intention to carry out the crime. B. Substantial Steps: Michelle and Cheryl took substantial steps towards completing the robbery. These steps include planning, making arrangements, purchasing the necessary items, and going to the nail salon, where they were arrested. C. Frustration of Completion: While Michelle and Cheryl were apprehended before they could execute their plan, the crime of attempt does not require the commission of the intended offense. The crucial factor is whether they had taken substantial steps towards its completion, which they clearly did. Conclusion: In conclusion, Michelle and Cheryl can be charged with conspiracy for planning to rob Capital One Bank. Furthermore, their actions also constitute attempted robbery due to their intent and the substantial steps they took towards completing the crime. Although they were arrested before executing the robbery, the law considers their preparations and intent as sufficient for an attempt charge. It is up to the court to assess the evidence and determine their guilt or innocence based on the merits of the case.

Sample Answer