The Response to Climate Change Catastrophes: Realism and Constructivism Perspectives

  Title: The Response to Climate Change Catastrophes: Realism and Constructivism Perspectives Thesis Statement: Realism theory predicts that states and international actors would respond to catastrophic effects of climate change with a focus on self-interest, power dynamics, and security concerns, while constructivism theory suggests that the response would prioritize shared norms, collective identity, and cooperative efforts to address the global challenge. Introduction As the catastrophic effects of climate change continue to unfold, the response from states and international actors becomes a critical aspect of global politics. This paper aims to analyze the potential responses to a specific consequence of climate change - sea level rise - based on two theories of international relations covered in the course: realism and constructivism. Realism Theory According to realism theory, states are driven by self-interest, power dynamics, and security concerns. In the context of sea level rise resulting from climate change, states may respond with a focus on protecting their own national interests, territory, and strategic assets. Realist perspectives would anticipate competition for resources in the affected regions, potential disputes over maritime boundaries and exclusive economic zones, and even military posturing as states seek to secure their positions in the face of environmental changes. Major powers, particularly those with coastal territories or significant maritime interests, may prioritize safeguarding their geopolitical influence and access to critical sea routes. Constructivism Theory In contrast, constructivism theory emphasizes the role of shared norms, collective identity, and cooperative efforts in shaping international relations. In response to catastrophic sea level rise, states and international actors may prioritize building collective responses based on shared understandings of environmental stewardship and global responsibility. Constructivist perspectives would anticipate the emergence of transnational advocacy networks, collaborative initiatives to address climate-induced displacement and humanitarian crises, and concerted efforts to foster collective identity around environmental protection. International institutions such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and regional organizations may play a central role in facilitating multilateral cooperation and norm diffusion to address the shared challenge of sea level rise. Conclusion In conclusion, the responses to catastrophic effects of climate change such as sea level rise as predicted by realism and constructivism theories reflect diverging perspectives on the nature of international relations. Realism theory anticipates responses driven by self-interest, power dynamics, and security concerns, while constructivism theory suggests a focus on shared norms, collective identity, and cooperative efforts to address the global challenge. As states and international actors grapple with the consequences of climate change, their responses are likely to be shaped by a complex interplay of these competing perspectives as they navigate the multifaceted implications of environmental catastrophes on the global stage.    

Sample Answer