The Rise of Deportation and Removal in the United States After 1990: Federal Rules and Consequences

Why was the United States “deporting” and “removing” so many non-citizens from the United States after 1990? Please discuss at least three federal rules that have shaped “the law of removal” after 1990. Please also discuss some of the consequences of these patterns for countries where so many of these American deportees have been sent over the last three decades.

  Title: The Rise of Deportation and Removal in the United States After 1990: Federal Rules and Consequences Introduction: After 1990, the United States witnessed a significant increase in the deportation and removal of non-citizens. This essay aims to explore the reasons behind this surge in removals, discussing three federal rules that have shaped the "law of removal" during this period. Additionally, it will examine the consequences of these patterns for countries that have received a substantial number of American deportees over the last three decades. Reasons for Deportation and Removal: Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986: The IRCA brought about stricter immigration enforcement measures, making it more challenging for undocumented immigrants to regularize their status. As a result, those not eligible for legalization faced an increased risk of deportation. The IRCA also introduced employer sanctions, which led to increased workplace raids and subsequent removals. Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996: The IIRIRA expanded the scope of deportable offenses and facilitated mandatory detention for certain categories of non-citizens. It also imposed stricter penalties for criminal convictions, broadening the grounds for removal. This law significantly increased the number of individuals subject to deportation and made it more difficult for non-citizens to appeal their removal orders. Secure Communities Program: Launched in 2008, the Secure Communities Program established a collaboration between federal immigration authorities and local law enforcement agencies. This program aimed to identify and deport individuals with criminal convictions or pending charges. It led to an increase in deportations as non-citizens encountered immigration enforcement through interactions with local police. Consequences for Countries Receiving American Deportees: Strained Social and Economic Systems: The sudden influx of American deportees has placed significant strain on the social and economic systems of recipient countries. These individuals often face challenges in finding employment, accessing healthcare, and reintegrating into communities that may be unfamiliar to them. The sudden increase in population can also lead to increased competition for resources within these countries. Social Stigma and Reintegration Challenges: American deportees may face social stigma upon their return to their countries of origin due to perceptions that they have failed in their pursuit of the "American Dream" or are associated with criminality. This stigma can hinder their reintegration into society, leading to isolation, limited opportunities, and psychological distress. Disruption of Family and Community Ties: Many American deportees have strong ties to the United States, including family members who are U.S. citizens or legal residents. Their deportation often results in the separation of families and the disruption of community networks, causing emotional distress and impacting the well-being of both deportees and their loved ones. Conclusion: The surge in deportation and removal after 1990 can be attributed to federal rules such as the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996, and the Secure Communities Program. These rules expanded grounds for removal and enabled more stringent enforcement measures. The consequences of these patterns for countries receiving American deportees include strained social and economic systems, social stigma, reintegration challenges, and disrupted family and community ties. Acknowledging these consequences is essential for developing comprehensive immigration policies that prioritize human rights and consider the well-being of all individuals involved.    

Sample Answer