The Theory and Method of Stratigraphy in Archaeology

Write a 750 – 1000 word APA formatted essay (not including title page/reference page) addressing the following:

  1. Choose one theory and one method archaeologists use.
  2. Discuss the archaeologist that implemented your theory.
  3. Discuss the archaeologist that implemented your method.
  4. Explain how that theory and method is used by archaeologists when excavating or surveying.
  5. Provide a critique of your theory and method.
  6. Identify both pros and cons
  7. What ways can they be improved? What are the latest developments, if any?
  8. Provide APA citations and reference them within your deliverable
find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

The Theory and Method of Stratigraphy in Archaeology

Thesis Statement: Stratigraphy, a theory of archaeological interpretation, and excavation, a method of archaeological investigation, are essential tools used by archaeologists to uncover and understand the layers of the past. While both stratigraphy and excavation have their strengths and weaknesses, recent developments in technology and interdisciplinary approaches offer promising opportunities for improvement.

Introduction Archaeology is a discipline that seeks to unravel the mysteries of the past through the careful study of material remains. To achieve this, archaeologists employ various theories and methods that allow them to interpret and excavate archaeological sites. In this essay, we will explore the theory of stratigraphy and the method of excavation as key components of archaeological research. We will examine the contributions of notable archaeologists in implementing these concepts and discuss their applications, critique both theory and method, and explore potential improvements in light of recent developments.

Theory: Stratigraphy Stratigraphy is a fundamental theory in archaeology that focuses on the vertical layering or stratification of archaeological deposits. It is based on the principle that, over time, different layers accumulate on top of each other, with the lower layers being older than the upper ones. This theory enables archaeologists to establish relative chronology and understand the temporal sequence of events at a site.

Archaeologist: Sir Flinders Petrie Sir Flinders Petrie (1853-1942), an English archaeologist, is renowned for his meticulous application of stratigraphy. His groundbreaking work in Egypt revolutionized archaeological methodology and laid the foundation for modern excavation techniques. Petrie developed a systematic approach to recording stratigraphic sequences through detailed drawings and careful documentation of artifacts and features found within each layer.

Method: Excavation Excavation is an archaeological method that involves the systematic removal of layers of soil or sediment to uncover and recover artifacts, structures, and ecofacts. It is a hands-on approach that provides archaeologists with direct access to the material remains of past human activity.

Archaeologist: Kathleen Kenyon Kathleen Kenyon (1906-1978), a British archaeologist, made significant contributions to the field of excavation. She implemented meticulous excavation techniques, including stratigraphic excavation, at numerous sites, most notably at Jericho and Tell es-Sultan. Kenyon’s emphasis on precise recording and painstaking attention to detail allowed for accurate interpretations of the stratigraphic sequences present at these sites.

Application of Stratigraphy and Excavation When archaeologists employ stratigraphy and excavation in tandem, they can reconstruct the history of a site by examining the different layers and their associated artifacts and features. Stratigraphy provides a relative chronology, allowing archaeologists to determine which layers are older or younger than others. Excavation allows for the systematic exploration of these layers, uncovering artifacts and structures that shed light on past human activities, social structures, and cultural practices.

Critique of Stratigraphy and Excavation Pros:

Stratigraphy provides a reliable framework for establishing a relative chronology.
Excavation allows for the recovery of artifacts in their original context, which enhances interpretation.
Both methods are flexible and adaptable to various types of archaeological sites.
Cons:

Stratigraphy can be challenging when there are disturbances or mixed deposits.
Excavation can be destructive to archaeological sites, leading to irreversible loss of cultural heritage.
Both methods rely heavily on human interpretation, which may introduce biases.
Improvements:

Integration of advanced dating techniques such as radiocarbon dating and luminescence dating can enhance the accuracy of stratigraphic sequences.
Non-invasive survey methods like ground-penetrating radar can reduce the need for extensive excavation.
Recent Developments Recent developments in technology have facilitated improvements in both stratigraphy and excavation methods. For instance:
High-resolution 3D scanning allows for precise documentation of excavation areas, enhancing the recording process.
DNA analysis provides insights into ancient human populations and their movements, complementing stratigraphic interpretations.

Conclusion
Stratigraphy and excavation are fundamental to the field of archaeology, enabling researchers to uncover and interpret the layers of the past. While they have their limitations, recent technological advancements offer promising avenues for improvement. By integrating interdisciplinary approaches and embracing innovative technologies, archaeologists can continue to deepen our understanding of ancient civilizations and their legacies.

References: Kenyon, K. M. (1957). Excavations at Jericho: Volume III: The Architecture and Stratigraphy of the Tell. London: British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem. Petrie, W. M. F., & Brunton, G. (1924). Sedmentary Deposits at El ‘Amarna 1891 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 – 1900. London: Bernard Quaritch Ltd.

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer