Full Answer Section

• Arguments Against Lethal Force: The commandment “Thou shalt not kill” (Exodus 20:13) is a central tenet. Jesus’ teachings on non-violence and turning the other cheek (Matthew 5:39) are also often cited. However, it’s important to note the original Hebrew word used in the Ten Commandments translates to “murder” not “killing” as in war or self-defense.  
• Saving Another’s Life: The Bible does contain examples of individuals risking their lives to save others, such as David fighting Goliath or Jonathan’s willingness to sacrifice himself for his friend David. This suggests a biblical basis for defending others.  

Conclusion: The Bible offers principles related to self-preservation and protecting others, but it doesn’t provide a simple “yes” or “no” answer to whether taking a life is justified in every self-defense situation. Interpretations vary, and individuals must wrestle with these principles in their own conscience.

2. Carrying a Concealed Weapon:

The Bible doesn’t directly address concealed carry. Therefore, whether carrying a concealed weapon is “biblical” depends on individual interpretation and application of broader biblical principles.

• Arguments for: Some argue that carrying a weapon is a responsible way to protect oneself and one’s family, aligning with the biblical idea of self-preservation and provision. They might also reference the second amendment.
• Arguments against: Others argue that carrying a concealed weapon contradicts the spirit of peace and non-violence found in Jesus’ teachings. They may also point to the potential for escalation and misuse of firearms.

Conclusion: Whether or not a Christian chooses to carry a concealed weapon is a matter of personal conviction and should be considered within the context of local laws and regulations. It is important to acknowledge that neither position is inherently unbiblical.

3. Stand Your Ground Laws and the Castle Doctrine:

• Stand Your Ground Laws: These laws generally remove the “duty to retreat” before using force in self-defense, even if it’s possible to safely retreat.  
• Castle Doctrine: This doctrine generally states that individuals have no duty to retreat when in their own home and can use force, including deadly force, if they reasonably believe it’s necessary to prevent imminent harm.  

Biblical Connection:

• Arguments for: Proponents might argue that these laws align with the biblical principle of defending oneself and one’s family. They might cite the example of a homeowner defending their property.
• Arguments against: Opponents might argue that these laws can escalate violence and contradict the emphasis on peace and reconciliation found in the New Testament. They might also raise concerns about potential for abuse and racial disparities in the application of these laws.

Conclusion: Like the issue of concealed carry, Stand Your Ground laws and the Castle Doctrine are not directly addressed in the Bible. Christians will have different perspectives based on their understanding of biblical principles and their views on the role of government and self-defense.

It’s crucial to approach these topics with humility and respect for differing interpretations. Engaging in thoughtful dialogue and seeking to understand others’ perspectives is essential, even when we disagree. Ultimately, each individual must prayerfully consider these issues and make decisions based on their conscience and understanding of scripture.