To argue the benefits of using children's literature to teach reading in early childhood years (3 years old to 3rd grade)
Directions: You are the curriculum specialist for your school and are implementing a new reading program using children's literature rather than basal textbooks or readers. You need to get buy-in from the teachers who will be using this method. Explain (in detail) at least three benefits of using children's literature to teach reading over basal reading textbooks.
Full Answer Section
By immersing children in high-quality literature, we are demonstrating that reading is a joyful and rewarding experience. This intrinsic motivation is a powerful driver for reading development. When children are genuinely interested in the story, they are more likely to persevere through challenging words, pay closer attention to details, and actively construct meaning. This early positive association with reading lays a crucial foundation for future literacy success and cultivates a lifelong habit of reading for pleasure and learning. Imagine a first grader eagerly anticipating the next chapter of a captivating chapter book versus reluctantly trudging through a predictable passage in a basal reader. The difference in engagement and motivation is palpable.
2. Developing Richer Vocabulary and Deeper Comprehension Skills in Context:
Children's literature exposes young readers to a far wider range of vocabulary and more complex sentence structures than typically found in basal readers. Authors of children's books often use vivid and descriptive language to create atmosphere, develop characters, and advance the plot. While the vocabulary is age-appropriate, it is often more nuanced and sophisticated than the carefully controlled vocabulary of a basal text.
When children encounter new words within the context of a meaningful story, they are more likely to understand and retain their meaning. They can use picture clues, surrounding text, and their prior knowledge to infer the meaning of unfamiliar words. This natural and contextualized vocabulary acquisition is far more effective and lasting than rote memorization of word lists often associated with basal programs.
Furthermore, children's literature naturally fosters the development of deeper comprehension skills. The rich narratives encourage children to think critically, make inferences, predict outcomes, understand character motivations, and identify themes. Discussing these elements in engaging stories allows teachers to model and guide students in developing these essential comprehension strategies in a meaningful and authentic way. For instance, exploring why Max behaves the way he does in "Where the Wild Things Are" encourages critical thinking about character development and emotions, a skill that transcends simply decoding words on a page. Basal readers, with their often simplistic narratives, provide fewer opportunities for this kind of in-depth comprehension work.
3. Providing Opportunities for Authentic Integration of Literacy Skills and Cross-Curricular Connections:
Children's literature naturally lends itself to the integrated teaching of various literacy skills. A single well-chosen picture book or chapter book can be used to teach phonics (through word study activities based on words from the text), vocabulary (as discussed above), fluency (through repeated readings and dramatic interpretations), and comprehension (through discussion and analysis). This holistic approach mirrors how reading actually functions in the real world, where these skills are interconnected and work together.
Moreover, children's literature offers fantastic opportunities for cross-curricular connections. A book about animals can lead to science lessons, a story set in a different culture can spark social studies discussions, and a book with mathematical concepts woven into the plot can be used in math instruction. This integration makes learning more relevant and engaging for children, as they see how literacy skills are applicable across different subject areas. For example, after reading "The Little House," students can discuss architectural styles (social studies), the impact of urbanization (social studies), or even explore concepts of size and perspective in the illustrations (math and art). Basal readers, with their isolated skill-based approach, often lack these natural connections and can feel disconnected from the broader curriculum.
In conclusion, the shift towards using children's literature as our primary reading material offers significant advantages over basal reading textbooks. It fosters a genuine love of reading and deeper engagement, develops richer vocabulary and deeper comprehension skills in meaningful contexts, and provides authentic opportunities for the integration of literacy skills and cross-curricular connections. I am confident that this approach will create more enthusiastic and skilled readers in our early childhood classrooms, setting them on a path for lifelong literacy success. I am eager to collaborate with you all in implementing this exciting new program. Thank you.
Sample Answer
. Fostering a Genuine Love of Reading and Deeper Engagement:
This is perhaps the most profound benefit. Children's literature, at its heart, is designed to captivate young minds. It offers compelling narratives, relatable characters, intriguing plots, and often, stunning illustrations. Think about the wonder evoked by stories like "The Very Hungry Caterpillar," the humor in "Elephant and Piggie" books, or the imaginative worlds of "Where the Wild Things Are." These books spark curiosity, ignite emotions, and create a genuine desire to know what happens next.
Basal readers, on the other hand, are often criticized for their contrived stories, repetitive sentence structures, and lack of authentic voice. Their primary purpose is to systematically introduce specific phonics skills and vocabulary, which can often come at the expense of meaningful content and reader engagement. For a young child just beginning their reading journey, the experience can feel more like a task than a pleasure.