Provide an analytical and cogent 300 – 500 words response on the assigned reading below.
The response must identify key concepts or arguments, make meaningful connections to at least two other texts or concepts or arguments assigned for the week, and employ analytical language.
Reading:
Sabri, B., Hong, J. S., Campbell, J. C., & Cho, H. (2013). Understanding children and adolescents’ victimizations at multiple levels: An ecological review of the literature. Journal of Social Service Research, 39(3), 322-334. DOI: 10.1080/01488376.2013.769835.
This article examines children and adolescents' exposure to violence in various contexts. The findings indicated that research differed in terminologies, conceptual and operational definitions, sample sizes, and age group classification for children and adolescents. As such, increased holistic assessments are critical for effective prevention and intervention strategies for at-risk children and adolescents.
Understanding Children and Adolescents’ Victimizations
Understanding Children and Adolescents’ Victimizations: An Ecological Review
In the article “Understanding children and adolescents’ victimizations at multiple levels: An ecological review of the literature,” Sabri, Hong, Campbell, and Cho explore the complex nature of children and adolescents’ exposure to violence in different contexts. They highlight the variations in terminologies, definitions, and classifications used in research, underscoring the need for holistic assessments to develop effective prevention and intervention strategies for at-risk youth. By examining the ecological factors surrounding victimization, the authors emphasize the importance of considering multiple levels of influence.
One key concept that the authors delve into is the need for holistic assessments. They argue that the existing research on children and adolescents’ victimizations lacks consistency in terminologies, definitions, sample sizes, and age group classifications. This inconsistency makes it challenging to compare and synthesize findings, hindering the development of effective interventions. To address this issue, the authors advocate for a holistic approach that considers multiple levels of influence, including individual, family, community, and societal factors.
To understand the complexity of children and adolescents’ victimizations, the authors conduct an ecological review of the literature. They examine studies that explore various forms of violence, such as child abuse, bullying, and community violence. By analyzing these studies, the authors highlight the diverse contexts in which victimization can occur and the interplay of factors that contribute to it. They emphasize the need for a comprehensive understanding of these contexts to develop targeted prevention and intervention strategies.
In connecting the authors’ work to other texts and concepts assigned for the week, two significant connections emerge. Firstly, their analysis aligns with the social-ecological framework, as discussed by Bronfenbrenner (1979). The authors emphasize the importance of considering multiple levels of influence, from individual to societal, in understanding children and adolescents’ victimizations. This connection underscores the need to examine the interactions between individuals and their environments to develop comprehensive strategies for prevention and intervention.
Secondly, the authors’ exploration of holistic assessments resonates with the concept of trauma-informed care, as discussed by Harris and Fallot (2001). By considering the diverse contexts and experiences of victimization, the authors advocate for a trauma-informed approach that recognizes the potential impacts of violence on children and adolescents. This connection highlights the importance of creating supportive and empowering environments that address the underlying trauma and promote healing.
Overall, Sabri, Hong, Campbell, and Cho’s article highlights the need for holistic assessments in understanding children and adolescents’ victimizations. By examining the ecological factors surrounding victimization and considering multiple levels of influence, the authors emphasize the complexity of these experiences. Connecting their work to concepts such as the social-ecological framework and trauma-informed care, the authors provide a comprehensive analysis that underscores the importance of considering individual and environmental factors in prevention and intervention efforts. As we strive to create safer environments for children and adolescents, it is crucial to adopt a holistic approach that addresses the diverse contexts and experiences of victimization.