Title: Upholding Ethical Standards in Behavior Analysis Practice: A Case Study Analysis

Thesis Statement:

In the case of Samar, a BCBA providing services to a child with intellectual disabilities, the violation of Ethics Code 5.01 – Behavioral Analysts’ Ethical Responsibility to Clients is evident due to the lack of adherence to professional obligations and ethical standards in ensuring the welfare and progress of the client. Additionally, the failure to address antecedent factors contributing to this scenario and implement preventative strategies underscores the importance of ethical decision-making and the need for a more ethical course of action to protect the client’s best interests.

Rationale for Chosen Code(s):

– Ethics Code 5.01 (Behavioral Analysts’ Ethical Responsibility to Clients): This code emphasizes the responsibility of behavior analysts to promote the welfare and best interests of their clients, maintain professional competence, integrity, and avoid harm. The code is relevant in this case as Samar’s actions may be undermining the client’s progress and well-being by discontinuing services without addressing the underlying issues effectively.

Code Violation:

Samar’s decision to discontinue ABA services without adequately addressing the non-compliance of Deon’s family with the recommended interventions violates Ethics Code 5.01, which necessitates behavior analysts to prioritize the welfare and progress of their clients.

Antecedent Factors Contributing to Scenario:

1. Lack of effective communication and collaboration between Samar and Deon’s family.
2. Inconsistent implementation of recommended interventions by Deon’s family.
3. Failure to conduct regular progress assessments to address deviations from the treatment plan.

Preventative Strategies:

1. Establish clear communication channels with the family to address concerns and ensure understanding of interventions.
2. Provide training and support to Deon’s family on implementing recommended strategies consistently.
3. Conduct regular progress evaluations to monitor the effectiveness of interventions and make necessary adjustments.

Ethical Course of Action:

1. Schedule a meeting with Deon’s family to discuss the challenges faced in implementing the recommendations.
2. Offer additional support and resources to assist the family in adhering to the intervention plan effectively.
3. Reassess Deon’s progress and modify interventions if needed to ensure his well-being and development are prioritized.

Future Risk Factors to Keep in Mind:

1. Potential regression in Deon’s progress due to discontinuation of services without proper transition or follow-up.
2. Damage to the professional reputation of Samar and his agency for failing to uphold ethical standards and responsibilities.
3. Legal implications for abrupt termination of services without due consideration for the client’s best interests.

In conclusion, Samar’s case serves as a poignant example of the ethical dilemmas faced by behavior analysts in ensuring client welfare amidst challenging circumstances. By adhering to ethical codes, addressing antecedent factors, implementing preventative strategies, and taking an ethical course of action, behavior analysts can navigate such scenarios effectively while upholding the highest standards of professional conduct and client care.