You are the associate vice president for education and training for Bobcat Health, an academic medical center and health system. The vice president of medical affairs comes to you concerned about the viability of the school’s residency programs. Several of the residency site stakeholders are seeking clarification regarding new reimbursement models being used by the system and gaining clarity on the revenue cycle process in general. Prepare a white paper for the VP of Medical Affairs to share with the residency sites outlining the differences between the new reimbursement models and prior, traditional models for stakeholders. Support your research with at least five sources. The use of professional charts / graphs to make the reading more interesting and to reinforce written content is encouraged. Ensure that your content and information is professional and can be followed by an executive audience. In your response, include the following:
Introduce and discuss the various reimbursement methods (e.g., capitated payments, fee-for-service, etc.) and include emerging models being introduced to the industry.
In your review, compare and contrast the traditional and new models and explain the motivation / reasons for the emerging models. Finally, based on this evidence, describe what impact (if any) you perceive there would be on the cost, quality and access to patient care. Support your research with peer-reviewed sources and/or market data. The use of professional charts / graphs to reinforce written content is encouraged. Ensure that your content and information is professional and can be followed by an executive audience.
Identify the various steps within the revenue cycle process, including admissions, case management, documentation, coding, billing, et cetera. For each step identified, provide the following:
Purpose of the step identified.
Responsible functions completed by individuals, such as coders, registration clerk, etc.
Key components of the function, such as verifying insurance, financial counseling, or coding of documented services provided.
Consequences of failure to properly conduct the function identified.
Assess how the application of digital tools might improve revenue cycle process management and performance.
Traditional vs. Emerging Healthcare Reimbursement Models
The move from traditional to emerging reimbursement models is fundamentally a transition from rewarding the quantity of services provided to rewarding the quality and efficiency of care delivered.
Traditional Reimbursement Model: Fee-for-Service (FFS)
The traditional payment structure, Fee-for-Service (FFS), compensates providers for each service, procedure, or test performed.
Key Feature: Providers submit a bill for every discrete service rendered, and payment is based on contracted rates for the volume of service.
Incentive: The financial incentive is to increase the volume of services, which can lead to overutilization, unnecessary procedures, and fragmented care, ultimately driving up healthcare costs.
Emerging Reimbursement Models: Value-Based Care (VBC)
Value-Based Care (VBC) models are a collection of alternative payment models (APMs) that reward providers for delivering high-quality, cost-effective care that results in superior patient health outcomes. The motivation for this shift stems from the need to address the high cost and often-inefficient nature of the FFS system, as national health expenditures continue to consume a large portion of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
| VBC Model | Description | Primary Incentive |
| Pay-for-Performance (P4P) | Providers receive bonus payments (upside risk) or incur penalties (downside risk) based on their performance on specific process, quality, and efficiency measures (e.g., patient satisfaction, readmission rates, use of best practices). | To meet or exceed quality and efficiency benchmarks. |
| Capitated Payments | Providers receive a fixed, upfront payment per member per month (PMPM) to manage all the healthcare needs for a defined group of patients for a specific time period. | To manage care efficiently and focus on preventive care to keep patients healthy, as the provider bears the financial risk for the cost of care. |
| Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) | Groups of providers are collectively responsible for the quality, cost, and overall care of a defined population of patients. If they keep costs below a benchmark while meeting quality metrics, they share in the savings (Shared Savings Programs). | To coordinate care across settings (inpatient, outpatient, specialists) and reduce unnecessary utilization (e.g., ED visits, readmissions). |
| Bundled Payments (Episodic Payments) | A single, fixed payment is made for all services related to a specific condition or episode of care (e.g., a total knee replacement) over a defined period. | To ensure care is delivered efficiently and in a coordinated manner during the entire episode to reduce complications and control costs. |
Export to Sheets
Impact of Value-Based Care on Cost, Quality, and Access
The transition to VBC is intended to have a profound positive impact on the "triple aim" of healthcare: Cost, Quality, and Access.
Cost 📉
VBC models are explicitly designed to reduce the overall cost of care.
Impact: VBC incentivizes providers to eliminate unnecessary tests and procedures and reduce high-cost events like hospital readmissions and Emergency Department (ED) visits. By shifting the focus to prevention and effective chronic disease management, VBC aims to lower total healthcare spending over time. Studies have shown that some large-scale VBC models, particularly Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), have achieved cost savings without compromising quality [4.3].
Sample Answer
Bobcat HealthOffice of Education and TrainingWhite Paper on Healthcare Reimbursement and Revenue Cycle Management
To: Vice President of Medical Affairs From: Associate Vice President for Education and Training Date: October 5, 2025 Subject: Clarification of New Healthcare Reimbursement Models and Revenue Cycle Process for Residency Sites
Executive Summary: The Shift from Volume to Value
The viability of Bobcat Health's residency programs, which are vital to our mission, depends on the financial stability of our training sites. This white paper addresses residency site stakeholders' concerns by clarifying the significant shift underway in healthcare reimbursement—a transition from traditional Fee-for-Service (FFS) to new Value-Based Care (VBC) models. This shift is driven by the national imperative to control escalating healthcare costs while improving patient outcomes. The paper also outlines the critical steps of the Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) process and demonstrates how digital tools can optimize performance in this new era of value-based payments.