in the form of an argumentative essay: What is Vimyism and do you agree with McKay and Swift that it has become a trap(yes) not about the battle of Vimy Ridge but rather how vimy commemoration changed over time
Vimyism: A Trap of Commemoration
Vimyism: A Trap of Commemoration
The Battle of Vimy Ridge, fought during World War I, holds great significance in Canadian history. It is often hailed as a pivotal moment that shaped the nation's identity and marked its emergence as an independent force on the global stage. However, over time, the commemoration of Vimy Ridge has evolved into something entirely different – Vimyism. In this essay, we will explore what Vimyism represents and argue that it has indeed become a trap, as suggested by McKay and Swift.
To understand Vimyism, we must first grasp its origins. Vimyism emerged as a way to commemorate the sacrifices made by Canadian soldiers during the Battle of Vimy Ridge. The battle, fought in April 1917, resulted in the capture of a strategic German position by the Canadian Corps. It was a hard-fought victory that cost the lives of nearly 3,600 Canadians, with thousands more injured. The battle became a symbol of Canadian bravery and unity.
However, as time went on, Vimyism shifted its focus from commemorating the battle to glorifying it. It began to emphasize a narrative of heroic sacrifice and unquestioning patriotism. The commemoration became less about remembering the tragic loss of life and more about celebrating a distorted version of Canadian nationalism.
McKay and Swift argue that Vimyism has become a trap because it narrows our perspective on Canada's history and stifles critical thinking. The commemoration has been co-opted by politicians and used as a tool to promote a sanitized version of our past, one that often overlooks the complexities and contradictions inherent in any nation's history.
Vimyism has transformed into a form of cultural nationalism that ignores the contributions and experiences of marginalized groups within Canadian society. Indigenous peoples, immigrants, and non-white Canadians are often overlooked or relegated to the periphery in Vimyism's narrative. Their stories are seldom heard, and their struggles for recognition and equality are diminished.
Furthermore, Vimyism perpetuates a myth of exceptionalism, portraying Canada as a uniquely virtuous nation. While it is undoubtedly important to acknowledge and commemorate the sacrifices made by Canadian soldiers, it is equally vital to recognize that war is a tragedy that affects all nations involved. By focusing solely on our own heroism, we risk diminishing the suffering and experiences of others.
Additionally, Vimyism can lead to complacency and a reluctance to critically examine our nation's actions in subsequent conflicts. It fosters an uncritical reverence for military endeavors and can discourage dissenting voices. By turning Vimy Ridge into a symbol of unassailable national pride, we run the risk of repeating past mistakes without proper reflection.
In conclusion, the commemoration of the Battle of Vimy Ridge has evolved into something different – Vimyism – which has become a trap for Canadian society. It narrows our perspective, marginalizes certain groups, perpetuates exceptionalism, and discourages critical thinking. While it is crucial to remember and honor the sacrifices made by Canadian soldiers, we must also strive to recognize the complexities of our history and embrace diverse narratives. By doing so, we can move beyond Vimyism's limitations and foster a more inclusive understanding of our nation's past.