What constitutes moral behavior

Full Answer Section

flourishing lay in the cultivation of the soul through intellectual and moral virtue. His own life, marked by his commitment to philosophical inquiry even in the face of death, served as a powerful embodiment of this belief. For Socrates, eudaimonia was not a passive state of happiness but an active pursuit of moral excellence driven by knowledge.  

Plato, deeply influenced by his mentor, expanded upon Socratic ideas while developing his own comprehensive philosophical system. His theory of Forms, articulated in seminal works like The Republic, provides a crucial framework for understanding his conception of eudaimonia. Plato posited the existence of a realm of perfect and eternal Forms, of which the physical world we perceive is merely a shadow. The Form of the Good stands as the highest and most fundamental Form, the ultimate source of all truth, beauty, and goodness. For Plato, eudaimonia is achieved through the soul’s ascent towards the knowledge of the Good. This ascent involves a process of intellectual and moral purification, guided by reason. In The Republic, Plato famously uses the allegory of the cave to illustrate the soul’s journey from ignorance to enlightenment, culminating in the apprehension of the Good.  

Plato believed that the human soul is composed of three parts: reason, spirit, and appetite. Eudaimonia is attained when these three parts are in harmonious balance, with reason ruling over the spirited and appetitive desires. Justice, both in the individual soul and in the ideal state, arises from this harmonious order. The virtuous individual, guided by reason’s knowledge of the Good, lives a just and balanced life, thereby achieving eudaimonia. While external goods are not entirely irrelevant for Plato, they are secondary to the cultivation of inner virtue and the pursuit of philosophical wisdom. The philosopher-king, who has attained the highest level of knowledge of the Good, serves as the ideal ruler in Plato’s just state, embodying the harmonious balance of reason and virtue necessary for individual and societal flourishing. Thus, for Plato, eudaimonia is the culmination of a lifelong pursuit of knowledge of the Good and the establishment of inner harmony through the rule of reason.  

Aristotle, Plato’s student, while deeply indebted to his teacher, diverged in significant ways in his understanding of eudaimonia. In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle offers a more empirically grounded and practical account of the good life. He begins by stating that “every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and pursuit, is thought to aim at some good; and for this reason the good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim.” For Aristotle, eudaimonia is the ultimate good, the end towards which all human actions are directed. Unlike Plato’s transcendent Form of the Good, Aristotle’s eudaimonia is intrinsically linked to human activity and flourishing within the earthly realm.  

Aristotle defines eudaimonia as “activity of the soul in accordance with virtue, and if there are more than one virtue, in accordance with the best and most complete virtue.” This definition highlights several key aspects of his conception. Firstly, eudaimonia is not a static state but an active engagement in virtuous activity. It is not simply feeling happy but doing well. Secondly, it is intrinsically connected to virtue (arete), which Aristotle defines as a mean between extremes. Virtues like courage, justice, temperance, and wisdom are dispositions that enable individuals to function well and live a flourishing life. Thirdly, Aristotle emphasizes the importance of “complete virtue,” suggesting that eudaimonia is achieved through the cultivation of a range of intellectual and moral virtues throughout a complete life.  

While intellectual virtue, particularly sophia (theoretical wisdom) and phronesis (practical wisdom), plays a crucial role, Aristotle also acknowledges the importance of external goods for eudaimonia. While virtue is the primary component, factors like health, friendship, and a moderate amount of wealth can contribute to a flourishing life by providing the necessary conditions for virtuous activity. However, Aristotle stresses that external goods are instrumental, not constitutive, of eudaimonia; true flourishing ultimately depends on the cultivation and exercise of virtue. His emphasis on practical wisdom (phronesis) is particularly significant, as it involves the ability to reason well about practical matters and to make sound judgments about how to act virtuously in specific situations. This practical dimension distinguishes Aristotle’s conception of eudaimonia from Plato’s more purely intellectual pursuit of the Form of the Good. For Aristotle, eudaimonia is the lifelong pursuit of virtuous activity, both intellectual and moral, within a supportive social and material context.  

In conclusion, the concept of eudaimonia, the good life, served as a central thread weaving through the fabric of ancient Western philosophy. While Socrates laid the groundwork by emphasizing the importance of knowledge and virtue for a life well-lived, Plato elevated this pursuit to the realm of transcendent Forms, with the knowledge of the Good as the ultimate aim. Aristotle, in turn, brought the concept back to the earthly realm, defining eudaimonia as virtuous activity encompassing both intellectual and moral excellence, acknowledging the instrumental role of external goods. Despite their differences in emphasis and metaphysical frameworks, these three towering figures of ancient philosophy shared a common conviction: that human flourishing is the ultimate aim of life and that its attainment requires a dedicated cultivation of virtue and the active engagement of our rational capacities. Their enduring exploration of eudaimonia continues to provide valuable insights into the perennial human quest for meaning, purpose, and the truly good life

Sample Answer

The Enduring Quest for the Good Life: Tracing Conceptions of Eudaimonia Across Ancient Western Philosophy

The ancient Western philosophical landscape, a fertile ground for intellectual inquiry, grappled with fundamental questions that continue to resonate today. Among these, the concept of the “good life,” often translated from the Greek term eudaimonia, stands as a central and enduring theme. While not always explicitly defined in the same manner, the pursuit of eudaimonia – a state of flourishing, living well, or human flourishing – served as a primary impetus for philosophical exploration across various schools of thought. This essay will trace the evolution of this key idea through the philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, examining their distinct yet interconnected conceptions of what constitutes eudaimonia and how it is achieved. By